• AI
  • Molecular Imaging
  • CT
  • X-Ray
  • Ultrasound
  • MRI
  • Facility Management
  • Mammography

Wavelet strategy eases storage, transmission of digital mammograms

Article

The high-resolution requirements of medical image modalities such as mammography delay the implementation of digital imaging systems. Increases in both processing and transmission time and storage capacity cost are associated with these images. These

The high-resolution requirements of medical image modalities such as mammography delay the implementation of digital imaging systems. Increases in both processing and transmission time and storage capacity cost are associated with these images. These demands have also hindered the use of computers as a second opinion in the detection of breast cancer.

While compression may provide a solution to this problem, clinical evaluations have yet to validate whether lossy compression can be applied to digital mammograms before interpretation.

A new study (IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003;22[10]:1288-1296) describes a wavelet compression scheme that can reduce the amount of data, and thus storage costs and transmission times, without significantly degrading image quality.

"It is clear that technological advances in storage and transmission are not sufficient to solve the problem," said lead author Monica Penedo-Ojea, Ph.D., a professor of radiology at University of Santiago de Compostela in Spain.

Penedo-Ojea presented an adaptation for high-resolution digital mammography of two region of interest (ROI) wavelet-based compression methods.

"Our region-based methods code only the breast region where the most important information is contained," she said.

Identifying those regions can be done by radiologists or by computer-aided diagnosis.

In the study, those ROI techniques have been evaluated against state-of-the-art compression methods, such as SPIHT and JPEG 2000, by means of PSNR (peak signal-to-noise ratio), a widely used parameter for measuring reconstruction quality of compressed images.

Penedo-Ojea found that region-based techniques performed substantially better than conventional SPIHT (set partitioning in hierarchical trees) and JPEG 2000, showing much higher quality in the breast region for the same compressed file size.

"For digital mammography, region-based compression methods represent an improvement in compression efficiency from full-image methods, also providing the possibility of encoding multiple regions of interest independently," she said.

Regions inside the mammogram containing primary radiological signs of breast cancer can be determined by an expert radiologist or a CAD system as a preliminary step in a compression scheme for digital mammography. These areas can then be compressed at different ratios from the rest of the breast. The image background can be discarded.

"ROI coding techniques are particularly suitable for digital mammography and, generally, for medical imaging," Penedo-Ojea said.

Earlier studies applying lossy compression methods to digital mammography have determined that loss of information does not affect diagnostic interpretation when compression rates are limited to certain ranges. Compression in these studies had been applied to the least rectangular area containing the breast region.

Related Videos
Improving the Quality of Breast MRI Acquisition and Processing
Can Fiber Optic RealShape (FORS) Technology Provide a Viable Alternative to X-Rays for Aortic Procedures?
Does Initial CCTA Provide the Best Assessment of Stable Chest Pain?
Making the Case for Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Vascular Interventions
Can Diffusion Microstructural Imaging Provide Insights into Long Covid Beyond Conventional MRI?
Assessing the Impact of Radiology Workforce Shortages in Rural Communities
Emerging MRI and PET Research Reveals Link Between Visceral Abdominal Fat and Early Signs of Alzheimer’s Disease
Reimbursement Challenges in Radiology: An Interview with Richard Heller, MD
Nina Kottler, MD, MS
The Executive Order on AI: Promising Development for Radiology or ‘HIPAA for AI’?
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.