Making a plan, or not, in radiology and life.
The other day, as I was setting out on my usual pre-work run, I noted I was in an unusually good mood. I’m not always a sourpuss when I force myself awake two hours earlier than completely necessary in order to huff and puff my way through 6-7 hilly miles before settling in for a 10-hour stint of work...but I’m not typically Mr. Sunshine at the time.
Having a certain compulsion to practice metaphorical dentistry on gift horses, I couldn’t just enjoy the cheeriness at face value, and was prepared to spend some of the hour’s exercise introspecting as to its source. It didn’t take long: The reason was that I had a plan for my after work hours that evening.
It wasn’t much of a plan, granted; just specifics as to what I was doing for dinner, and returning a phone call I had recently received. Usually, after finishing work, I have all of 3 hours before I need to get to sleep, and that slice of time is typically a blank canvas…which I tend to prefer, what with the other 21 hours of the day pretty much spoken for.
Evidently, even the small matter of having a plan for what I was doing about 12 hours subsequently was pleasing to some part of my mind other than the part that jealously guards its free time.
In truth, we’ve got plans for everything. I’m not saying they’re all good ones, nor well thought out or even something consciously thought of. Even deciding to “wing it,” entering a situation without any forethought or other prep, is essentially planning not to have a plan. The moment the situation is manifest, however, one is planning on the fly, acting on instinct, reflex, habits, etc. I’ve spent entire vacations proving this to myself.[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"50791","attributes":{"alt":"Planning in radiology","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_7755672322296","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"6221","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"height: 128px; width: 171px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px; float: right;","title":"©Albina Glisic/Shutterstock.com","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
We like plans, even just the notion of having them. Politicians routinely get themselves elected by saying things like “I have a plan,” even if they never spell out what the plan is. Fictional villains (James Bond nemeses leap to mind) entice audiences to pay attention for 2-3 hours at a time because they have diabolical plans for the good guy to thwart. Entire industries are based on the notion that you, the customer, will shell out your hard-earned dough to be covered by one of their plans (insurance, investment, timeshares, you name it).
As entangled in plans as we are, we also seem to be jaded with them, or enamored with the concept of their failure. There’s no shortage of truisms in this regard: “No battle plan survives contact with the enemy.” “The best-laid plans of mice and men…” “Man plans, and God laughs.” In fiction, it’s almost a guarantee that if the audience learns the details of a character’s plan of action, subsequent scenes will show the plan encountering difficulty, if not failing entirely. (Those James Bond villains mentioned above generally only fail after they have explained their master plans to 007.)
I’ve had more than a few plans during my career, predating even my plans to compete for positions in radiology residency and fellowship programs. Plans for location and type of post-training work. Plans for pursuing partnership, plans for what I’d do after attaining it, and contingency plans for if/when partnership turned out to be an empty promise. Getting into teleradiology was something of a leap of faith at the time; it panned out well for me, but I had backup plans if that didn’t go well.
Beyond the individual level, the complexity of plans skyrockets, because there are so many more variables; how can anyone hope to consider all of them? Which doesn’t stop us from trying to plan for changes in reimbursement, regulation, study volume, demands of referring clinicians and facilities, the job market, advances in technology, etc.
How worthwhile is it, making all these plans when there always seems to be some unexpected variable? Well, there’s the sense of comfort I referenced at the beginning of this column; that’s a nice benefit as long as one doesn’t get too smug and off-guard that one has all bases covered.
Even if when plans fail spectacularly, they aren’t necessarily a wasted effort. The time and thought put into them will surely pay some dividends when one has to come up with a last minute Plan B, or may even be of use in matters unrelated.
Burnout in Radiology: Key Risk Factors and Promising Solutions
June 9th 2025Recognizing the daunting combination of increasing imaging volume and workforce shortages, these authors discuss key risk factors contributing to burnout and moral injury in radiology, and potential solutions to help preserve well-being among radiologists.
Mammography AI Platform for Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Gets FDA De Novo Authorization
June 2nd 2025Through AI recognition of subtle patterns in breast tissue on screening mammograms, the Clairity Breast software reportedly provides validated risk scoring for predicting one’s five-year risk of breast cancer.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Can Emerging AI Software Offer Detection of CAD on CCTA on Par with Radiologists?
May 14th 2025In a study involving over 1,000 patients who had coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) exams, AI software demonstrated a 90 percent AUC for assessments of cases > CAD-RADS 3 and 4A and had a 98 percent NPV for obstructive coronary artery disease.
Could AI-Powered Abbreviated MRI Reinvent Detection for Structural Abnormalities of the Knee?
April 24th 2025Employing deep learning image reconstruction, parallel imaging and multi-slice acceleration in a sub-five-minute 3T knee MRI, researchers noted 100 percent sensitivity and 99 percent specificity for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears.