Resolution and luminance are not the only factors to be considered when selecting a workstation, according to a new paper.
Resolution and luminance are not the only factors to be considered when selecting a workstation, according to a new paper.
"With so many workstation models on the market, selecting the right one for daily use in a particular imaging environment can be daunting," said Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Ph.D., of the radiology department at the University of Arizona.
Krupinski attempts to relieve much of the confusion in a March paper (Radiology 2007 Jan 17;[Epub ahead of print]) that summarizes critical workstation elements as well as characteristics radiologists should consider when shopping for a workstation.
To select the appropriate workstation, she recommends conducting a preselection survey to understand workstation requirements. Radiologists should be asked several questions:
Radiologists should also be asked to rank by importance 11 workstation interface issues ranging from default image quality and gray-scale adjustments to multimodality image fusion and 3D presentation.
"Since there is no one-size-fits-all workstation, users must consider a variety of factors when choosing," Krupinski said.
Krupinski said one of the first considerations is whether the workstation will be dedicated to a single modality or serve multimodalities.
A multimodality workstation must be capable of displaying the highest resolution images as close to full resolution as possible, she said.
If full-field digital mammograms and breast MR images are to be viewed on the same workstation, the display must be capable of presenting the higher resolution full-field digital mammograms (a minimum of 3 megapixels) at or near full resolution. The lower resolution MR images will obviously appear at full resolution on a high-resolution display.
If the single modality option is used, full-field digital mammograms still need a high-resolution display, but MR images can be viewed on a lower 1-MP display.
Full-field digital mammography and projection radiography (both computed and direct radiography) typically require high-resolution monochrome displays, but CT, MR, ultrasound, and nuclear medicine applications do not need high-resolution displays, Krupinski said.
The paper does not rehash the CRT versus LCD debate. LCDs now have sufficient luminance levels and contrast ratios and are being widely used in radiology departments, even for full-field digital mammogram viewing.
FDA Clears Virtually Helium-Free 1.5T MRI System from Siemens Healthineers
June 26th 2025Offering a cost- and resource-saving DryCool magnet technology, the Magnetom Flow.Ace MRI system reportedly requires 0.7 liters of liquid helium for cooling over the lifetime of the device in contrast to over 1,000 liters commonly utilized with conventional MRI platforms.
SNMMI: Botox May Facilitate Relief from Dry Mouth Side Effect of PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceuticals
June 25th 2025For patients being treated with radiopharmaceutical agents for metastatic prostate cancer, the combination of botulinum toxin and an anti-nausea patch led to a 30 percent reduction in PSMA uptake in the salivary glands, according to preliminary research findings presented at the SNMMI conference.
SNMMI: Can 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT Bolster Detection of PCa Recurrence in the Prostate Bed?
June 24th 2025In an ongoing prospective study of patients with biochemical recurrence of PCa and an initial negative PSMA PET/CT, preliminary findings revealed positive 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT scans in over 54 percent of the cohort, according to a recent poster presentation at the SNMMI conference.