Your CV is more than just what you can read.
Every now and then, I find myself in circumstances requiring me to send someone an updated copy of my CV. Before doing so, I take the opportunity to look over the thing, as some updating is invariably due. So reviewing, I never fail to wonder at how poorly the document represents me. Yes, the requisite information is there-where and when I was schooled and trained, how I’ve worked subsequently, the handful of times I somehow managed to be involved in publishing something, etc. It doesn’t, however, give its prospective readers much of a reason to hire, partner with, or otherwise give a damn about me as opposed to the gazillion other radiologists whose CVs more or less look the same. All of what I would consider my greatest strengths are nowhere to be found in it. A CV, for instance, does not have much to say directly about one’s work ethic. Nor his attention to detail. Creativity, patience, adaptability, capacity to learn new things. Interpersonal skills (or lack thereof). State of health (mental, as well as physical). Interests and abilities outside of the workplace. There are, of course, mechanisms by which such other assets can be communicated-letters of recommendation, for instance, or references who can be called upon from previous places of work and study. Even an interview or less-formal interactions can give others a glimpse at the real person behind the CV. Making sure these things get conveyed isn’t the only tricky bit. Having these good traits (or at least avoiding having bad ones) is an even less-tangible affair. The items on the CV are pretty well etched in stone-once you earned your degree from XYZ Medschool, it’s a done deal. Although a snarky comment about CME and MOC does tempt my typing fingers. Things like being a good listener or a trustworthy colleague are more transient; you’re only liable to have your references say such things about you if you’ve persistently lived up to them, and it might be difficult to put the best of yourself on full display during a brief interview or meeting. Further, if it’s been 20 years since both your residency days and your last conscious effort at maintaining good posture, your CV might loyally attest to the validity of your training…but will do nothing to ameliorate the visual impact of your hunching spine and rounded shoulders.On the flipside, those 20 years (or however long it’s been for you) provide endless opportunities for growth and development, and it’s never too late to start polishing the unwritten portion of your resume.
Burnout in Radiology: Key Risk Factors and Promising Solutions
June 9th 2025Recognizing the daunting combination of increasing imaging volume and workforce shortages, these authors discuss key risk factors contributing to burnout and moral injury in radiology, and potential solutions to help preserve well-being among radiologists.
Mammography AI Platform for Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Gets FDA De Novo Authorization
June 2nd 2025Through AI recognition of subtle patterns in breast tissue on screening mammograms, the Clairity Breast software reportedly provides validated risk scoring for predicting one’s five-year risk of breast cancer.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Can Emerging AI Software Offer Detection of CAD on CCTA on Par with Radiologists?
May 14th 2025In a study involving over 1,000 patients who had coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) exams, AI software demonstrated a 90 percent AUC for assessments of cases > CAD-RADS 3 and 4A and had a 98 percent NPV for obstructive coronary artery disease.
Could AI-Powered Abbreviated MRI Reinvent Detection for Structural Abnormalities of the Knee?
April 24th 2025Employing deep learning image reconstruction, parallel imaging and multi-slice acceleration in a sub-five-minute 3T knee MRI, researchers noted 100 percent sensitivity and 99 percent specificity for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears.