Radiation exposure has been a dicey issue for researchers developing multislice CT coronary artery imaging. According to critics, MSCT exposes patients to twice as much ionizing radiation as conventional cardiac catheterization.
Radiation exposure has been a dicey issue for researchers developing multislice CT coronary artery imaging. According to critics, MSCT exposes patients to twice as much ionizing radiation as conventional cardiac catheterization.
No one disputes that MSCT produces dazzling coronary artery images, a fact that Dr. H.C. Maximilian Reiser stressed during an opening day press conference at the ECR meeting Friday. The director of the Institute for Clinical Cardiology at the Grosshadern Clinic in Munich described the spectacular coronary artery imaging possible with 64-slice CT technology.
Reiser displayed images acquired with a 64-slice scanner showing coronary artery plaques that were obscured by artifact-causing calcifications on four-slice CT. The axial coronary artery images from the 64-slice scanner characterized the plaque, its calcified cap and lipid core, as well as plaque embedded in the lumen of the artery.
"You can differentiate the patent lumen from the plaque component," he said.
Reiser noted that radiation exposure can be reduced by modulating the amount of exposure through the cardiac cycle, and especially by reducing exposure during systole.
When this and other strategies are employed, the actual radiation exposure associated with 64-slice CT imaging is in the range of cardiac catheterization. The issue is less important with 64-slice CT than with 16-slice scanners and far less than with four-slice technology, where radiation exposure was definitely a reason for concern, he said.
Shaping the Future of Radiology in 2025: Trends, Threats, and Opportunities
January 10th 2025How do we respond to challenges with staff recruitment, cybersecurity, and looming hospital takeovers in radiology? This author assesses key trends in radiology and offers key insights to stay competitive in the field.
Can MRI Have an Impact with Fertility-Sparing Treatments for Endometrial and Cervical Cancers?
January 9th 2025In a literature review that includes insights from recently issued guidelines from multiple European medical societies, researchers discuss the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in facilitating appropriate patient selection for fertility-sparing treatments to address early-stage endometrial and cervical cancer.
Surveillance Breast MRI Associated with Lower Risks of Advanced Second Breast Cancers
January 8th 2025After propensity score matching in a study of over 3,000 women with a personal history of breast cancer, researchers found that surveillance breast MRI facilitated a 59 percent lower risk in advanced presentations of second breast cancers.