My favorite end-of-day refuge after walking miles in McCormick Place is a minimalist Asian fusion restaurant with delicious food and low prices. I read the RSNA Bulletin. I eat. I depart.
December 2004 - My favorite end-of-day refuge after walking miles in McCormick Place is a minimalist Asian fusion restaurant with delicious food and low prices. I read the RSNA Bulletin. I eat. I depart.
Tonight, a person sporting a green badge, indicating an M.D., sat down at the table next to me. Was this an astute medical director or physician-trained administrator? How wrong I was! This gourmand was a cardiologist seeking truth and wisdom about state-of-the-art PACS.
"What are you doing here?" I asked. "Why don't you attend your own convention, the American College of Cardiology?"
Well, he had, and this cardiologist's tale should be of interest to vendors and radiologists alike.
His suburban practice has several offices situated over a 40-mile area. The partners are busy. None are getting any younger. Access to echocardiograms and x-ray films has been a time-consuming, delay-ridden hassle. One of the hospitals is planning for PACS. Through hospital PACS planning committee meetings, the cardiologists became intrigued.
So when this cardiologist went to the ACC meeting, he looked at the offerings of the cardiac PACS vendors. In his opinion, radiology PACS vendors are light-years ahead in technology development. Ironically, the cardiologist overlooked one system that might work well for his practice. Not knowing this, and armed with hospital-sponsored paperwork, he registered for the RSNA meeting to learn about PACS.
"If only the ACC had this caliber of courses pertaining to PACS," the cardiologist said. "I need to become savvy quickly. Cardiologists cannot keep their heads in the sand. I need to find out if any cutting-edge vendor can meet our needs. Radiologists do not know just how advanced these PACS are."
I asked the cardiologist if he revealed his identity. He asked if I routinely wore a target on my back while walking in the woods during deer hunting season.
"I'm just an inquisitive referring physician," he said.
Was anything else in the technical exhibitions of interest?
"Yes," he replied. "Teleradiology nighthawk services."
The cardiologist explained that he reads some procedures that could be read by a radiologist, but he thinks he interprets them better. But most imaging procedures he performs include additional studies that require the interpretation of a radiologist. Depending on these findings, additional diagnostic procedures may need to be ordered and read by radiologists.
"Rather than evaluate from a financial perspective the additional business I bring to a radiology practice, the partners fret about the loss of revenue for the exams that I do read. Rather than realize that we should be sharing information in a collaborative manner for the benefit of the patient, the radiologists are focused on the concern that I will take their business away. To some extent, I do, but if I bring them business they would otherwise not receive, what is the point? I don't think they bother to analyze this," he said.
The reason the cardiologist met with teleradiology nighthawk services was to identify an alternative radiology practice to supplement the local one. It's a whole new business opportunity for the nighthawks, and it poses some interesting issues about the radiology versus cardiology debate.
"They were surprised, but they were interested," the cardiologist said.
Did the cardiologist find his perfect PACS? He had not, but he'd learned a lot. And he would visit the vendor booth he'd overlooked.
"So when I see your badge with an M.D. tag, I've identified a cardiologist," I said as I was leaving.
"Not really", he replied. "I think I'm outnumbered by orthopedic surgeons. You should hear what they say about what they are seeing for orthopedics on the trade show floor!"
I had to agree. This year's crop of orthopedic workstations is really impressive.
Can Photon-Counting CT be an Alternative to MRI for Assessing Liver Fat Fraction?
March 21st 2025Photon-counting CT fat fraction evaluation offered a maximum sensitivity of 81 percent for detecting steatosis and had a 91 percent ICC agreement with MRI proton density fat fraction assessment, according to new prospective research.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current Perspectives on the Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Brain PET
March 18th 2025In a new podcast, Satoshi Minoshima, M.D., Ph.D., and James Williams, Ph.D., share their insights on the recently updated appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET and tau PET in patients with mild cognitive impairment.
Strategies to Reduce Disparities in Interventional Radiology Care
March 19th 2025In order to help address the geographic, racial, and socioeconomic barriers that limit patient access to interventional radiology (IR) care, these authors recommend a variety of measures ranging from increased patient and physician awareness of IR to mobile IR clinics and improved understanding of social determinants of health.
AI-Initiated Recalls After Screening Mammography Demonstrate Higher PPV for Breast Cancer
March 18th 2025While recalls initiated by one of two reviewing radiologists after screening mammography were nearly 10 percent higher than recalls initiated by an AI software, the AI-initiated recalls had an 85 percent higher positive predictive value for breast cancer, according to a new study.