• AI
  • Molecular Imaging
  • CT
  • X-Ray
  • Ultrasound
  • MRI
  • Facility Management
  • Mammography

Clinicians prefer structured, multimedia-enhanced reports

Article

Physicians from a variety of specialties show a strong preference for structured radiology reports that are enhanced with embedded images, according to a study presented at the SCAR meeting. The results, while not entirely surprising, highlight an

Physicians from a variety of specialties show a strong preference for structured radiology reports that are enhanced with embedded images, according to a study presented at the SCAR meeting.

The results, while not entirely surprising, highlight an important area where radiologists can avoid marginalization by providing added value to their reports, said Dr. Bruce Reiner, director of radiology research at the VA Maryland Health Care System.

With the goal of persuading his facility's CIO to invest in a structured reporting system, Reiner developed a study to quantify the added value of structured reports with embedded images.

Reiner and colleagues gathered seven chest/abdomen CT exams and provided different reports for the exams. The content of the reports remained constant, but the reports offered four presentation styles:
? Prose without images
? Structured report without images
? Prose with embedded images
? Structured report with embedded images

The researchers presented the reports to six surgeons, seven primary care physicians, and four physicians from varying subspecialties. They asked the clinicians to rate each report based on content, clarity, completeness, consistency, and confidence.

The clinicians showed a significant preference for structured text reports. They also showed an increased preference for both prose and structured text reports with embedded images. This preference was consistent across all the physician specialties, Reiner said.

In terms of overall report value, the clinicians gave the highest ratings to structured text reports with embedded images.

The sample size was small, and there was an inherent bias in the sample because all the clinicians had previously dealt only with text-only reports, Reiner said. Still, the positive results for structured, multimedia reports provides an opportunity for radiologists to become technology experts in the organization and distribution of imaging data sets.

The next step is to study whether perceived value on the part of the clinicians will translate into an actual increase in referrals, he said.

Related Videos
Improving the Quality of Breast MRI Acquisition and Processing
Can Fiber Optic RealShape (FORS) Technology Provide a Viable Alternative to X-Rays for Aortic Procedures?
Does Initial CCTA Provide the Best Assessment of Stable Chest Pain?
Making the Case for Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Vascular Interventions
Can Diffusion Microstructural Imaging Provide Insights into Long Covid Beyond Conventional MRI?
Assessing the Impact of Radiology Workforce Shortages in Rural Communities
Emerging MRI and PET Research Reveals Link Between Visceral Abdominal Fat and Early Signs of Alzheimer’s Disease
Reimbursement Challenges in Radiology: An Interview with Richard Heller, MD
Nina Kottler, MD, MS
The Executive Order on AI: Promising Development for Radiology or ‘HIPAA for AI’?
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.