A prototype system developed by the University of Maryland was able, for a time at least, to dramatically boost and document the communication of critical results findings, according to a presentation Tuesday. It’s since been sent back to the drawing board for more work, but points to a solution to a problem that vexes radiologists nationwide.
A prototype system developed by the University of Maryland was able, for a time at least, to dramatically boost and document the communication of critical results findings, according to a presentation Tuesday. It's since been sent back to the drawing board for more work, but points to a solution to a problem that vexes radiologists nationwide.
Documenting the communication of critical findings is required by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, but is always problematic for radiology departments. Checking with the physician who referred the patient for imaging frequently finds him or her gone, or no longer in charge of the patient, said Paul Nagy, Ph.D., who presented the paper. Often, trying to find the right person proves to be an exhausting process.
The university's radiology department tried a commercially available notification system that meets JCAHO standards, but it wasn't popular with radiologists or referring physicians, Nagy said. Radiologists, in particular, wanted to be sure that their hot finding was communicated to and understood by the physician in a position to act on it and the commercial system didn't give them that assurance.
"They couldn't stand it if they had a serious finding," Nagy said. "They needed to get hold of somebody."
Initially, the system was used in about 10 (out of 25,000) cases at the hospital per month but eventually declined to about two per month, Nagy said.
Looking for a better solution, the department developed its own system based on a web tool that mines the hospital's electronic medical record to learn where a patient is currently located, who has been working with him or her recently, who has been placing orders, and what service team is providing care. Names and contact information of identified clinicians are provided to the radiologist.
Physicians who might need to be told about findings may include those who are looking at the images and those who have been placing lab orders for the patient. Once the potential clinicians are identified, a blogging system records attempts by the radiologist to contact the ones who might need to know about the critical finding.
The university's radiology department implemented the system in April and in the first month it was used to communicate 90 critical findings. The clinical IT support team trained the chest and body sections first. In the first two weeks there were a total of 38 critical findings; 21 were delivered within the first 60 minutes.
"This was very exciting," Nagy said. "We opened our champagne bottles and wrote our abstract for the RSNA."
But a short time later use of the system declined dramatically. One big problem was that a new set of residents and fellows came in and the integrated contact database was not updated promptly, Nagy said. That probably reduced the numbers by 10% to 20%.
Another problem was data overload. Some patients are touched by 200 clinicians over the course of 24 hours and weeding through that list was too difficult for the radiologist, Nagy said. Another problem was that the radiologist would move on to other work while waiting for a callback and the system design made it difficult to return to log the result.
"We're back into the rebuild phase," Nagy said.
Can MRI-Based AI Bolster Biopsy Decision-Making in PI-RADS 3 Cases?
December 9th 2024In patients with PI-RADS 3 lesion assessments, the combination of AI and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) level achieved a 78 percent sensitivity and 93 percent negative predictive value for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), according to research presented at the Radiological Society of North American (RSNA) conference.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
RSNA 2020: Addressing Healthcare Disparities and Access to Care
December 4th 2020Rich Heller, M.D., with Radiology Partners, and Lucy Spalluto, M.D., with Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, discuss the highlights of their RSNA 2020 session on health disparities, focusing on the underlying factors and challenges radiologists face to providing greater access to care.
New Interventional Radiology Research Shows Merits of Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee OA
December 3rd 2024In a cohort of over 160 patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA), including grade 4 in nearly half of the cases, genicular artery embolization led to an 87 percent improvement in the quality of life index, according to research presented at the recent RSNA conference.
Siemens Healthineers Debuts New Photon-Counting CT Systems at RSNA
December 2nd 2024Debuting at the Radiological Society of North American (RSNA) conference, the new photon-counting computed tomography (PPCT) scanners Naeotom Alpha.Pro and Naeotom Alpha.Prime reportedly combine rapid scan times with high-resolution precision.