Claims that cast doubt on whether radiographers should continue to undertake reporting of medical images has sparked a row between two professional bodies.
Claims that cast doubt on whether radiographers should continue to undertake reporting of medical images has sparked a row between two professional bodies.
A publication by the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) disputes evidence that radiographers who undertake image interpretation are more cost-effective and provide the same levels of quality and safety.
The document, ‘Medical image interpretation by radiographers: Guidance for radiologists and healthcare providers,’ says that these assertions are ‘unproven.’
The Society and College of Radiographers (SCoR) has described the RCR’s advice as “disappointing” and has responded with its own document, ‘Medical image interpretation by radiographers: Definitive guidance.’ In the foreword, the president of the society, Gill Dolbear, states: “Radiographer reporting is safe, subject to reporting radiographers and their employers/contractors adhering to our guidance.
“It is important that healthcare organizations continue to develop and deploy reporting radiographers to continue to meet the current and future challenges of delivering comprehensive clinical imaging services in the U.K.”
In its document, the RCR advises that ‘suitably trained radiographers’ should undertake medical image reporting only when:
The SCoR asserts that “radiographers make a significant contribution to the reporting workload and, as radiography is a regulated Allied Health Profession, are directly accountable for their practice, including reporting.”
The SCoR guidance also states that the organization has always demanded and continues to demand that radiographers must operate to the same standard as their clinical radiologist colleagues, regardless of the field they report in.
Gill Dolbear adds: “It is disappointing that the RCR have taken it upon themselves to pronounce upon the roles of radiographers. It is redolent of an era that passed one, if not two, decades ago. As the SCoR’s definitive guidance clearly states, the RCR has failed to offer any evidence to support their position and their document is based on opinion.”
For further information, contact Professor Audrey Paterson, Director of Professional Policy, at the Society and College of Radiographers, on 020 7740 7208. PDFs of both the RCR and the SCoR documents can be downloaded: here.
MRI-Based AI Radiomics Model Offers 'Robust' Prediction of Perineural Invasion in Prostate Cancer
July 26th 2024A model that combines MRI-based deep learning radiomics and clinical factors demonstrated an 84.8 percent ROC AUC and a 92.6 percent precision-recall AUC for predicting perineural invasion in prostate cancer cases.
Breast MRI Study Examines Common Factors with False Negatives and False Positives
July 24th 2024The absence of ipsilateral breast hypervascularity is three times more likely to be associated with false-negative findings on breast MRI and non-mass enhancement lesions have a 4.5-fold likelihood of being linked to false-positive results, according to new research.
Can Polyenergetic Reconstruction Help Resolve Streak Artifacts in Photon Counting CT?
July 22nd 2024New research looking at photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) demonstrated significantly reduced variation and tracheal air density attenuation with polyenergetic reconstruction in contrast to monoenergetic reconstruction on chest CT.