e-health conference organizers go for the goldYou know you're in the middle of a trend when every batch of mail (e- and otherwise) bears at least one bid to attend a conference on that very topic. That said, this year would appear to be
You know you're in the middle of a trend when every batch of mail (e- and otherwise) bears at least one bid to attend a conference on that very topic. That said, this year would appear to be the year of Internet strategizing. It is also the year of e-health, and HIPAA, and B2B, and ASPs, and patient and provider empowerment.
Here is a sampling of the dozens of conferences and seminars and summits we (and likely you) have been invited to attend in recent months:
Some of these, of course, are annual events that are merely evolving to meet the changing needs of their constituencies and the marketplace. Look at HIMSS getting involved in telehealth, the AMA promoting online physician certification, and the RSNA's ongoing commitment to IHE. But most of these conferences appear to be designed primarily to ride what the organizers see as a wave of financial opportunity (and in increasingly exotic locations, no less).
I understand that's how business works. You see a hot market or product, and why not jump on the bandwagon, get a piece of the proverbial pie? That's what all the dot-coms did once the stock market had been primed by the likes of Healtheon/WebMD.
But how much stock should you put in an organization or company that claims to be the authority on new business strategies and economic models but doesn't appear to recognize when their intended market has already become all but saturated (albeit in Internet time)?
The healthcare industry is in the midst of an amazing educational and informational frenzy. Everyone wants to know how to use the Internet and make money off of it, and they want to make sure they figure this out before their competitors do. In terms of economics, it is the modern-day equivalent of the Industrial Revolution, and I think we will all look back in a few years and shake our heads at the things we do not know now, at all that we thought it might be.
But for the time being, we are merely trying to understand how it works, what it means, where we are going, and how it will all play out. And so we go to these meetings and conferences, do our own bit of strategizing to figure out which ones will yield the best information, and hope our competitors have chosen this time not to attend.
Thank goodness for press passes.
Comments/questions: kkincade@cmp.com
MRI-Based AI Radiomics Model Offers 'Robust' Prediction of Perineural Invasion in Prostate Cancer
July 26th 2024A model that combines MRI-based deep learning radiomics and clinical factors demonstrated an 84.8 percent ROC AUC and a 92.6 percent precision-recall AUC for predicting perineural invasion in prostate cancer cases.
Breast MRI Study Examines Common Factors with False Negatives and False Positives
July 24th 2024The absence of ipsilateral breast hypervascularity is three times more likely to be associated with false-negative findings on breast MRI and non-mass enhancement lesions have a 4.5-fold likelihood of being linked to false-positive results, according to new research.
Can Polyenergetic Reconstruction Help Resolve Streak Artifacts in Photon Counting CT?
July 22nd 2024New research looking at photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) demonstrated significantly reduced variation and tracheal air density attenuation with polyenergetic reconstruction in contrast to monoenergetic reconstruction on chest CT.