In a recent video interview from the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference, Tessa Cook, MD, PhD discussed new research on automated de-identification in radiology reports and the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) to help address time-consuming challenges in the radiology workflow.
While increased imaging volume remains a daunting challenge in radiology, emerging developments in artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) may help alleviate worklist fatigue.
In an interview from the recent RSNA conference, Tessa Cook, M.D.,Ph.D. spoke about the potential of NLP to assist with imaging protocols in radiology, the capability of AI to streamline radiology workflows and recently published research on an emerging model for automating de-identification in radiology reports.
Along with colleagues from the University of Pennsylvania and Stanford University, Dr. Cook co-authored a recently published study assessing a new model that provides automated de-identification for radiology reports.1 While she noted an abundance of de-identification tools for DICOM data and the likelihood of that capability being built into PACS for many radiologists, Dr. Cook said this is more challenging for protected health information (PHI) in radiology reports.
“The distribution of (PHI) data is very different for radiology reports than it is for medical text,” said Dr. Cook, an Associate Professor of Radiology, Chief of 3-D and Advanced Imaging and Director of the Center for Practice Transformation in Radiology at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.
Dr. Cook noted that NLP could help ease the time-consuming nature of assigning imaging protocols given the existence of large quantities of training data that can capture the homogeneity of an imaging practice. She added that AI could be beneficial for more quantitative tasks such as comparisons and the tracking of lesion measurements over time.
“There are so many use cases (for AI). I think the ones that are going to succeed are the ones that are going to make the radiologist workflow more straightforward and more efficient,” said Dr. Cook.
For more insights from Dr. Cook, watch the video below.
Reference
1. Chambon PJ, Wu C, Steinkamp JM, Adleberg J, Cook TS, Langlotz CP. Automated deidentification of radiology reports combining transformer and “hide in plain sight” rule-based methods. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Nov 23;ocac219. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac219 . Online ahead of print.
Can Abbreviated Breast MRI Have an Impact in Assessing Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response?
April 24th 2025New research presented at the Society for Breast Imaging (SBI) conference suggests that abbreviated MRI is comparable to full MRI in assessing pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Clarius Mobile Health Unveils Anterior Knee Feature for Handheld Ultrasound
April 23rd 2025The T-Mode Anterior Knee feature reportedly offers a combination of automated segmentation and real-time conversion of grayscale ultrasound images into color-coded visuals that bolster understanding for novice ultrasound users.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
What is the Best Use of AI in CT Lung Cancer Screening?
April 18th 2025In comparison to radiologist assessment, the use of AI to pre-screen patients with low-dose CT lung cancer screening provided a 12 percent reduction in mean interpretation time with a slight increase in specificity and a slight decrease in the recall rate, according to new research.
Meta-Analysis Shows Merits of AI with CTA Detection of Coronary Artery Stenosis and Calcified Plaque
April 16th 2025Artificial intelligence demonstrated higher AUC, sensitivity, and specificity than radiologists for detecting coronary artery stenosis > 50 percent on computed tomography angiography (CTA), according to a new 17-study meta-analysis.