Exemption protects in-office imaging
Congress acknowledged that physician self-referral causes an inherent conflict of interest that can be resolved only by banning the practice. But it did not include blanket restrictions in the Ethics in Patient Referral Act of 1989. The law, authored by Rep. Fortney "Pete" Stark (D-CA), is generally referred to as Stark I.
Congress acknowledged that physician self-referral causes an inherent conflict of interest that can be resolved only by banning the practice. But it did not include blanket restrictions in the Ethics in Patient Referral Act of 1989. The law, authored by Rep. Fortney "Pete" Stark (D-CA), is generally referred to as Stark I.
Because radiologists do not have the authority to refer patients, they were exempted when the law was applied to medical imaging services in 1995. Those amendments are called Stark II.
Exemptions were also stipulated for in-office imaging and other ancillary services performed in physicians' offices. They apply when in-office imaging meets specific supervision, location, and billing requirements. -JMB
Mammography Study Compares False Positives Between AI and Radiologists in DBT Screening
May 8th 2025For DBT breast cancer screening, 47 percent of radiologist-only flagged false positives involved mass presentations whereas 40 percent of AI-only flagged false positive cases involved benign calcifications, according to research presented at the recent American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) conference.
