Exemption protects in-office imaging

Article

Congress acknowledged that physician self-referral causes an inherent conflict of interest that can be resolved only by banning the practice. But it did not include blanket restrictions in the Ethics in Patient Referral Act of 1989. The law, authored by Rep. Fortney "Pete" Stark (D-CA), is generally referred to as Stark I.

Congress acknowledged that physician self-referral causes an inherent conflict of interest that can be resolved only by banning the practice. But it did not include blanket restrictions in the Ethics in Patient Referral Act of 1989. The law, authored by Rep. Fortney "Pete" Stark (D-CA), is generally referred to as Stark I.

Because radiologists do not have the authority to refer patients, they were exempted when the law was applied to medical imaging services in 1995. Those amendments are called Stark II.

Exemptions were also stipulated for in-office imaging and other ancillary services performed in physicians' offices. They apply when in-office imaging meets specific supervision, location, and billing requirements. -JMB

Newsletter

Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.

Recent Videos
CT-Based Deep Learning Model May Reduce False Positives with Indeterminate Lung Nodules by Nearly 40 Percent
Leading Breast Radiologists Discuss Rise of Breast Cancer Incidence in Women Under 40
New Research Examines Radiation Risks with CT Exposure Prior to Pregnancy
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.