Radiologists may face a dramatic increase in workload if they get what they want and virtual colonoscopy becomes the modality of choice for colon cancer screening. Reading exams in less than five minutes with only a minor drop in sensitivity is feasible, however, according to a study presented at the American Roentgen Ray Society meeting.
Radiologists may face a dramatic increase in workload if they get what they want and virtual colonoscopy becomes the modality of choice for colon cancer screening. Reading exams in less than five minutes with only a minor drop in sensitivity is feasible, however, according to a study presented at the American Roentgen Ray Society meeting.
Researchers led by Dr. Philippe Lefere of the radiology department at the Stedelijk Ziekenhuis in Belgium studied the accuracy of two readers examining virtual colonoscopies from 180 patients.
Patients prepared for virtual colonoscopy with low-fiber diets and a reduced cathartic cleansing with magnesium citrate and bisacodyl as well as stool tagging with barium. Researchers obtained CT studies in both the prone and supine positions.
Two readers interpreted studies on CT colonography workstations equipped to handle primary 2D reads with fast 3D correlation. The first reader worked under a five-minute limit for interpreting exams. The second reader took as much time as needed to complete an interpretation.
The readers detected a total of 42 lesions 6 to 9 mm in size and 30 that were larger than 1 cm. The first reader took an average of four minutes and 32 seconds to complete exam interpretations, compared with nine minutes and 15 seconds for the second reader.
Sensitivity for the first reader was 76.2% for lesions greater than or equal to 6 mm and 100% for lesions 1 cm or larger, resulting in an 86.1% overall sensitivity, according to Lefere. The second reader exhibited an 85.7% sensitivity for 6-mm or larger lesions and 100% sensitivity for lesions larger than 1 cm, for an overall sensitivity of 91.6%.
Of course, even if a radiologist could routinely and accurately read virtual colonoscopy exams in less than five minutes, the study did not examine the affects of reader fatigue, Lefere said. Reading exams at the end of a long day may yield different results than interpreting exams first thing in the morning.
To perform a good exam regardless of speed, radiologists need intensive training and a quiet and comfortable reading environment, he said. In the future, computer-aided detection may help reduce perceptual errors.
For more information from the online Diagnostic Imaging archives:
Large CT colonography trial opens with mixed reactions
CT colonography dose varies little over years
CT colonography standards foster exam's legitimacy
Seven Takeaways from Meta-Analysis of PSMA Radiotracers for Prostate Cancer Imaging
December 1st 2023In a newly published meta-analysis of 24 studies, researchers noted that the PSMA PET radiotracer 18F PSMA-1007 may provide more benefit than 68Ga Ga-PSMA-11 for primary staging of patients with prostate cancer and detection of local lesion recurrence, but also has drawbacks with higher liver uptake and multiple reports of false positive bone lesions.
Study: Regular Mammography Screening Reduces Breast Cancer Mortality Risk by More than 70 Percent
November 30th 2023Consistent adherence to the five most recent mammography screenings prior to a breast cancer diagnosis reduced breast cancer death risk by 72 percent in comparison to women who did not have the mammography screening, according to new research findings presented at the annual Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference.
FDA Clears Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Platform for Non-Invasive Assessment of Brain Chemistry
November 29th 2023BrainSpec Core reportedly offers enhanced sensitivity for low-grade gliomas and may facilitate the diagnosis of conditions including Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and epilepsy.