HIPAA deadline passes quietly with only minor procedural changes

Article

Long lead time allowed facilities to prepareWhen fully implemented, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) promises to have an enormous impact on the practice of medicine. It will establish comprehensive

Long lead time allowed facilities to prepare

When fully implemented, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) promises to have an enormous impact on the practice of medicine. It will establish comprehensive national standards for the protection of patients' health information. The first steps in that direction, however, have fallen softly on the landscape of medicine in the U.S.

On April 14, 2003, HIPAA privacy standards were implemented with little fanfare and, arguably, little new adverse effect. The radiology department at St. Luke's Imaging Center in Boise, ID, for example, was in full compliance by the April 14 deadline. Manager Julie Mellinger said the department had already adapted its computer system to meet privacy requirements and had implemented privacy guidelines.

"It took a lot of time, and there was definitely a financial commitment to complying," Mellinger said. "But much of what was required had already been done."

The more challenging aspects of the act are still coming. Components dealing with the electronic transmission of patient records, including images, will be implemented Oct. 16 for large healthcare providers, according to Kaleb Jamal, a spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

All health insurers, healthcare clearinghouses, and healthcare providers must comply with the new standards-but not all at the same time. Those with annual receipts totaling less than $5 million have until April 14, 2004, to comply.

HIPAA has been a long time coming. Passed by Congress in 1996, the act not only sets privacy standards but also includes "administrative simplification" provisions intended to improve the administrative efficiency and effectiveness of the healthcare system. These require that certain transactions electronically transmitted by health insurers, healthcare providers (including imaging centers), and others be completed using national, uniform standards.

"Most of this involves formalizing and documenting things that radiology departments already do," said Patricia Kroken, a consultant with Healthcare Resource Providers of Albuquerque, NM.

While HIPAA addresses both privacy issues and electronic transmission, she said the electronic transmission of patient images would not be substantially affected. But there will be important requirements.

"Staff will need to make sure their images are secure and that they're using caution in handling patient data," she said.

Many facilities in the U.S., especially those using lower tech solutions, will have a relatively easy time meeting these requirements. Most women's health centers will likely be among them. Sandy Lopez, manager of the Memorial Breast Evaluation Center in Long Beach, CA, said the law has had minimal effect on her facility so far.

"We're not using full-field digital, and we're not yet using a PACS," she said. "Regarding confidentiality, we've already been doing a lot of that."

Recent Videos
What New Research Reveals About Computed Tomography and Radiation-Induced Cancer Risk
What New Interventional Radiology Research Reveals About Treatment for Breast Cancer Liver Metastases
New Mammography Studies Assess Image-Based AI Risk Models and Breast Arterial Calcification Detection
Can Deep Learning Provide a CT-Less Alternative for Attenuation Compensation with SPECT MPI?
Employing AI in Detecting Subdural Hematomas on Head CTs: An Interview with Jeremy Heit, MD, PhD
Pertinent Insights into the Imaging of Patients with Marfan Syndrome
What New Brain MRI Research Reveals About Cannabis Use and Working Memory Tasks
Current and Emerging Legislative Priorities for Radiology in 2025
How Will the New FDA Guidance Affect AI Software in Radiology?: An Interview with Nina Kottler, MD, Part 2
A Closer Look at the New Appropriate Use Criteria for Brain PET: An Interview with Phillip Kuo, MD, Part 2
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.