Hospital opts for go-slow implementation approach

Article

Not long ago, vendors suggested that PACS implementations should take months or even years. Today, the same vendors claim implementation can be achieved in a matter of weeks. One Canadian enterprise formed by the merger of three hospitals located

Not long ago, vendors suggested that PACS implementations should take months or even years. Today, the same vendors claim implementation can be achieved in a matter of weeks.

One Canadian enterprise formed by the merger of three hospitals located within a 2-km radius initially contemplated a big bang horizontal approach to PACS implementation, targeting modalities in all three hospitals at the same time. But for logistical and technical reasons, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) eventually settled for a steady-state hospital-by-hospital approach.

"This approach allows us to concentrate all our personnel (for technical support and training) in one place," said Dr. Luigi Lepanto, a professor of radiology at l'Université de Montréal.

The danger with a longer planning period, however, is that it encourages changes in the final configuration (number of workstations, number of DICOM interfaces, CR needs), he said.

CHUM identified three crucial steps in planning its PACS project:

?Assemble a team to steer the project. CHUM's team included the chief of radiology and two hospital directors, although most project work was delegated to a coordinating committee representing radiology, nuclear medicine, the medical corps, biomedical engineering, IT, and finance.
?Identify prerequisites - site visits, review of literature, RFI.
?Establish a vendor-evaluation process.


While PACS is an enterprise-wide project that requires a multidisciplinary approach to planning and implementation, a large coordinating committee uncorks personality and political clashes.

"These difficulties are inevitable in such a large undertaking but are worth the risk to ensure that the project has buy-in of the greatest number of participants," Lepanto said.

He cautions to never underestimate the impact of PACS outside the radiology department.

"Remember that a PACS project has ramifications that go well beyond the borders of radiology, and any number of individuals or groups, if not consulted at the outset, can impede the project," he said.

Another caveat Lepanto offers is to adopt an integrated approach to IT implementation, since PACS is but one component of the digital hospital.

"If different projects (RIS, central dictation, HIS, ADT) are addressed independently, the result may be a tower of Babel with little interaction and an operational disaster at the user level," he said.

Recent Videos
A Closer Look at MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Monitoring and Treating Glioblastomas
Incorporating CT Colonography into Radiology Practice
What New Research Reveals About Computed Tomography and Radiation-Induced Cancer Risk
What New Interventional Radiology Research Reveals About Treatment for Breast Cancer Liver Metastases
New Mammography Studies Assess Image-Based AI Risk Models and Breast Arterial Calcification Detection
Can Deep Learning Provide a CT-Less Alternative for Attenuation Compensation with SPECT MPI?
Employing AI in Detecting Subdural Hematomas on Head CTs: An Interview with Jeremy Heit, MD, PhD
Pertinent Insights into the Imaging of Patients with Marfan Syndrome
What New Brain MRI Research Reveals About Cannabis Use and Working Memory Tasks
Current and Emerging Legislative Priorities for Radiology in 2025
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.