In 1999, when the National Academy of Engineering asked professional engineering societies to rank the top achievements of the 20th century, they ranked medical imaging techniques at number 14, one rung below the Internet and one above household appliances. A decade later the providers of imaging services and the companies that sell this equipment are scapegoats targeted for rate cutting and taxation. What happened?
In 1999, when the National Academy of Engineering asked professional engineering societies to rank the top achievements of the 20th century, they ranked medical imaging techniques at number 14, one rung below the Internet and one above household appliances. Yes, household appliances! In supporting their decision they described imaging as having "revolutionized medical diagnostics." A decade later the providers of imaging services and the companies that sell this equipment are scapegoats targeted for rate cutting and taxation. What happened?
Not much, actually. And that's the problem. Today's reimbursement problems come more from inaction than from action. Radiology is an easy political target because it has no natural constituency among the public for its leaders to rally to its defense.
We who have worked in this community for decades appreciate medical imaging for what it has done and can do in the future. But I doubt this appreciation is shared by the general public. I doubt many in the general public even know what radiologists do.
Those who would defend this profession and the community built around it are warning of dire consequences from a change in the Medicare utilization rate aimed at facilities that are still reeling from cuts imposed by the Deficit Reduction Act.
The American College of Radiology and the Access to Medical Imaging Coalition are trying to get the word out. Access to medical imaging will slide, they say. The quality of healthcare will falter. Some patients will die prematurely. But who, I wonder, is listening?
When President Obama seeks to push a legislative agendum through Congress, he stumps from coast to coast, stirring the masses. Political strength is drawn from the people. Unless radiology can get its message across to Joe the Plumber and others like him, radiology will be fighting an uphill battle on the reimbursement front for years to come.
The imaging community, including providers and vendors, has for decades realized that the future of medical imaging depends on the quality of images and the accuracy of diagnoses. Lately it has come to recognize the importance of cost-effectiveness and efficiency in the mainstream of medical practice. It has yet to come to grips with the politico-economic realities that will define healthcare in the future. Only by reaching out to the public can it do so.
Study: Use of Preoperative MRI 46 Percent Less Likely for Black Women with Breast Cancer
July 11th 2024In the study of over 1,400 women with breast cancer, researchers noted that Black women with dense breasts or lobular histology were significantly less likely to have preoperative MRI exams than White women with the same clinical characteristics.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Envisioning the Ideal Radiology Reading Room: Keys to Optimizing Form and Function
July 2nd 2024Emphasizing core concepts of sound ergonomics, accessibility, inclusivity, personalization, and convenient storage can help foster reading room environments with minimal distraction and optimal productivity.
ACR Collaborative Model Leads to 35 Percent Improvement with Mammography Positioning Criteria
July 1st 2024Noting significant variation with facilities for achieving passing criteria for mammography positioning, researchers found that structured interventions, ranging from weekly auditing of images taken by technologists to mechanisms for feedback from radiologists to technologists, led to significant improvements in a multicenter study.