Procedures to ensure patient privacy don’t do much, if patient data end up on portable electronics. This happens more commonly than might be expected, according to a survey conducted by Credant Technologies, a Dallas-based firm specializing in data protection solutions.
Procedures to ensure patient privacy don’t do much, if patient data end up on portable electronics. This happens more commonly than might be expected, according to a survey conducted by Credant Technologies, a Dallas-based firm specializing in data protection solutions.
Credant’s survey of more than 1000 healthcare professionals in the U.S. and U.K. indicates that more than a third unwittingly put personal information at risk. They are storing patient records, medical images, contact details, corporate data, and other sensitive information on laptops, BlackBerrys, and USB sticks that are not adequately secured. As many as one-fifth of the staff surveyed in the U.K. increase the risk by bringing their own devices into work and using them to store patient data, according to the survey.
Even more do so in the U.S. The survey found that a third of healthcare professionals in the U.S. were downloading sensitive details onto their own personal devices, a basic breach of practice if they were not complying with the security policy set up by their employer.
The use of laptops and portable communications devices in the healthcare sector has escalated rapidly in the last several years, particularly in radiology, where these devices are being used as part of extended thin-client networks. The growth has been driven by their relative ease of use, speed, increased memory capacity, and affordability. As indicated by the survey, the great benefits of these devices are accompanied by huge security and managerial problems for IT departments.
When asked how health practitioners secure their data when using their own equipment, many said they rely on basic security. Some 35% of those in the U.K. said they were using just a password. Using software downloaded from the Internet, hackers need about five minutes to bypass simple passwords made up of a name, dictionary word, or an easily remembered number, according to Credant.
About 6% of U.K. survey participants admitted to storing sensitive patient details with no security whatsoever. This was better than in the U.S., where 18% used no security to ensure the safety of information they store on their devices.
The most popular device used by U.K. medical practitioners was a laptop, used by 62% of respondents. USB sticks were next at 17%, and BlackBerrys or other handheld devices were third with 13%. The most common type of data stored were work contacts, but 15% of respondents said they stored patient records and medical images.
SNMMI: Can 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT Bolster Detection of PCa Recurrence in the Prostate Bed?
June 24th 2025In an ongoing prospective study of patients with biochemical recurrence of PCa and an initial negative PSMA PET/CT, preliminary findings revealed positive 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT scans in over 54 percent of the cohort, according to a recent poster presentation at the SNMMI conference.
Could an Emerging PET Tracer be a Game Changer for Detecting Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
June 23rd 2025In addition to over 90 percent sensitivity in detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the glypican-3 (GPC3) targeted PET tracer 68Ga-aGPC3-scFv appeared to be advantageous in identifying HCC tumors smaller than one centimeter, according to pilot study findings presented at the SNMMI conference.
SNMMI: What a New Meta-Analysis Reveals About Radiotracers for PET/CT Detection of PCa
June 22nd 2025While (68Ga)Ga-PSMA-11 offers a pooled sensitivity rate of 92 percent for prostate cancer, (18F)-based radiotracers may offer enhanced lesion detection as well as improved imaging flexibility, according to a meta-analysis presented at the Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) conference.