Patients undergoing low dose CT chest screening for lung cancer may also be assessed by automated coronary artery calcification scoring.
Patients undergoing low-dose computed tomography (CT) chest screening for lung cancer may also be automatically assessed for their risk for a cardiovascular event with the use of automated coronary artery calcification scoring, according to the results of a study published recently in PLoS One.
Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of mortality in heavy cigarette smokers, according to study author Ivana Išgum, PhD, of the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands. Results of the National Lung Screening Trial showed that cardiovascular disease was the first cause of death among patients, and results of the NELSON lung cancer screening study showed that 30 percent of deaths were caused by cardiovascular disease.
Išgum and colleagues showed in a prior study of patients enrolled in NELSON that patients at risk for cardiovascular disease could be identified based on coronary and aortic calcium scoring.
[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"24066","attributes":{"alt":"","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_6973042926467","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"2029","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"float: right; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 1px;","title":" ","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
“Manual calcium scoring in screening chest CT data is cumbersome, mostly because of the low radiation dose resulting in high noise levels and cardiac motion,” IÅ¡gum said. “Hence, manual scoring in large data sets, as required in screening, would be labor intensive and, therefore, expensive.”
The possibility of performing automatic coronary calcium scoring in lung cancer screening programs might allow identification of patients who are at high risk of experiencing a cardiovascular event, without additional costs and without additional radiation burden for the participants.
This study of automated scoring included 1,793 low-dose CT chest scans. All of the scans were analyzed using the preliminary version of the evaluated algorithm for automated calcium scoring in order to establish a reference standard. Then, each scan was analyzed manually by one of four trained raters, and if necessary, the raters corrected the errors of the algorithm. Finally, the coronary artery calcium scores were automatically quantified.
When analyzing the results, the researchers had to discard 44 scans for beam hardening artifacts or gross segmentation errors. Based on the reference scores, the median Agatston score was 55.8, the median volume score was 87.4 mm3 and the median number of calcifications was 3. Based on the automated scores, the median Agatston score was 39.6, the median volume score was 60.4 mm3 and the median number of calcifications was 2.
According to the Bland-Altman plots the automated score quantification underestimated calcium score values and the number of calcifications.
“For Agatston risk categories the linearly weighted kappa demonstrated very good reliability (κ= 0.85),” the researchers wrote. “For continuous values, despite underestimation coronary artery calcium scores by automated quantification, the intraclass correlation coefficient was very good for Agatston score (0.90), very good for calcium volume (0.88) and good for number of calcifications (0.64).”
“The study at hand evaluated the algorithm in a large data set and demonstrated its robustness,” IÅ¡gum said. “Nevertheless, the performance is not yet at the level of human operator and that is certainly our next aim.”
If developed further, this automatic scoring system could identify patients at risk for cardiovascular disease allowing them to be referred for preventive care, Išgum said.
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
The Reading Room Podcast: A Closer Look at Remote MRI Safety, Part 2
July 25th 2025In the second of a multi-part podcast episode, Emanuel Kanal, M.D. and Tobias Gilk, MRSO, MRSE, share their perspectives on remote MRI safety protocols for ensuring screening accuracy and adherence to conditional implant guidelines as well as a rapid and effective response to adverse events.
Study Reveals Significant Prevalence of Abnormal PET/MRI and Dual-Energy CT Findings with Long Covid
July 22nd 2025In a prospective study involving nearly 100 patients with Long Covid, 57 percent of patients had PET/MRI abnormalities and 90 percent of the cohort had abnormalities on dual-energy CT scans.
Stroke MRI Study Assesses Impact of Motion Artifacts Upon AI and Radiologist Lesion Detection
July 16th 2025Noting a 7.4 percent incidence of motion artifacts on brain MRI scans for suspected stroke patients, the authors of a new study found that motion artifacts can reduce radiologist and AI accuracy for detecting hemorrhagic lesions.