The National Cancer Institute last month added fuel to the controversyover mammography screening of women aged 40 to 49. NCI proposeda revision to its breast cancer screening guidelines that withdrawsthe institute's recommendation that women aged 40 to
The National Cancer Institute last month added fuel to the controversyover mammography screening of women aged 40 to 49. NCI proposeda revision to its breast cancer screening guidelines that withdrawsthe institute's recommendation that women aged 40 to 49 receiveregular screening mammograms. NCI's prior guidelines, establishedin 1987, recommended mammography every one to two years and anannual clinical breast examination for women in the 40 to 49 agegroup.
The proposed guideline recommends that asymptomatic women aged40 to 49 receive a clinical breast examination annually and discussthe appropriateness of a screening mammogram individually withtheir physicians. No changes were proposed for NCI's guidelinesfor women who are 50 and over.
NCI proposed the revisions because years of research failedto show a benefit for annual screening of women between 40 and49, said Dr. Peter Greenwald in the Journal of the National CancerInstitute. Greenwald is director of NCI's Division of Cancer Preventionand Control (DCPC).
The revisions would put NCI at odds with the American CancerSociety, which recommends screening for women in the 40 to 49age group. The American College of Radiology also registered itsconcern about the proposed revisions, stating that the ACR couldnot support them.
"These proposed changes in the NCI guidelines will onlyserve to confuse women and their physicians about the benefitsof screening mammography in the earlier detection of breast cancerin all age groups," the ACR said.
The DCPC's board of scientific counselors signed off on theproposed revisions on Oct. 21 and forwarded its recommendationsto the National Cancer Advisory Board. The board will review theissue at its next meeting, on Nov. 22 and 23.
Can Photon-Counting CT be an Alternative to MRI for Assessing Liver Fat Fraction?
March 21st 2025Photon-counting CT fat fraction evaluation offered a maximum sensitivity of 81 percent for detecting steatosis and had a 91 percent ICC agreement with MRI proton density fat fraction assessment, according to new prospective research.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current Perspectives on the Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Brain PET
March 18th 2025In a new podcast, Satoshi Minoshima, M.D., Ph.D., and James Williams, Ph.D., share their insights on the recently updated appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET and tau PET in patients with mild cognitive impairment.
Strategies to Reduce Disparities in Interventional Radiology Care
March 19th 2025In order to help address the geographic, racial, and socioeconomic barriers that limit patient access to interventional radiology (IR) care, these authors recommend a variety of measures ranging from increased patient and physician awareness of IR to mobile IR clinics and improved understanding of social determinants of health.
AI-Initiated Recalls After Screening Mammography Demonstrate Higher PPV for Breast Cancer
March 18th 2025While recalls initiated by one of two reviewing radiologists after screening mammography were nearly 10 percent higher than recalls initiated by an AI software, the AI-initiated recalls had an 85 percent higher positive predictive value for breast cancer, according to a new study.