NCI proposes mammography revisions

Article

The National Cancer Institute last month added fuel to the controversyover mammography screening of women aged 40 to 49. NCI proposeda revision to its breast cancer screening guidelines that withdrawsthe institute's recommendation that women aged 40 to

The National Cancer Institute last month added fuel to the controversyover mammography screening of women aged 40 to 49. NCI proposeda revision to its breast cancer screening guidelines that withdrawsthe institute's recommendation that women aged 40 to 49 receiveregular screening mammograms. NCI's prior guidelines, establishedin 1987, recommended mammography every one to two years and anannual clinical breast examination for women in the 40 to 49 agegroup.

The proposed guideline recommends that asymptomatic women aged40 to 49 receive a clinical breast examination annually and discussthe appropriateness of a screening mammogram individually withtheir physicians. No changes were proposed for NCI's guidelinesfor women who are 50 and over.

NCI proposed the revisions because years of research failedto show a benefit for annual screening of women between 40 and49, said Dr. Peter Greenwald in the Journal of the National CancerInstitute. Greenwald is director of NCI's Division of Cancer Preventionand Control (DCPC).

The revisions would put NCI at odds with the American CancerSociety, which recommends screening for women in the 40 to 49age group. The American College of Radiology also registered itsconcern about the proposed revisions, stating that the ACR couldnot support them.

"These proposed changes in the NCI guidelines will onlyserve to confuse women and their physicians about the benefitsof screening mammography in the earlier detection of breast cancerin all age groups," the ACR said.

The DCPC's board of scientific counselors signed off on theproposed revisions on Oct. 21 and forwarded its recommendationsto the National Cancer Advisory Board. The board will review theissue at its next meeting, on Nov. 22 and 23.

Recent Videos
New Mammography Studies Assess Image-Based AI Risk Models and Breast Arterial Calcification Detection
Can Deep Learning Provide a CT-Less Alternative for Attenuation Compensation with SPECT MPI?
Employing AI in Detecting Subdural Hematomas on Head CTs: An Interview with Jeremy Heit, MD, PhD
Pertinent Insights into the Imaging of Patients with Marfan Syndrome
What New Brain MRI Research Reveals About Cannabis Use and Working Memory Tasks
Current and Emerging Legislative Priorities for Radiology in 2025
How Will the New FDA Guidance Affect AI Software in Radiology?: An Interview with Nina Kottler, MD, Part 2
A Closer Look at the New Appropriate Use Criteria for Brain PET: An Interview with Phillip Kuo, MD, Part 2
How Will the New FDA Guidance Affect AI Software in Radiology?: An Interview with Nina Kottler, MD, Part 1
A Closer Look at the New Appropriate Use Criteria for Brain PET: An Interview with Phillip Kuo, MD, Part 1
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.