Some obstetricians are turning away obese patient, wary of the higher risk of complications and about the safety of patients on their exam tables. Radiology struggles with similar issues. Is it time to set limits?
Some obstetricians are turning away obese patient, wary of the higher risk of complications and about the safety of patients on their exam tables.
According to a recent article in South Florida's Sun Sentinel, 15 out of 105 OBGYN practices polled by the paper have set weight cut-offs for patients.
Certainly, obesity is a concern for radiologists, too. Quality can be compromised when imaging obese patients, whether in X-Ray, CT or MRI. Plus, some patients simply can't fit into standard equipment, creating workflow problems and questions about when to invest in newer, larger apeture equipment. Toshiba, GE, Seimens and others all have released equipment with larger apetures and made to support heavier patients.
A 2004 study reviewed radiology reports filed between 1989 and 2003 that were labeled as "limited by body habitus," meaning limited in quality due to the patient's size. The percentage of limited reports nearly doubled over the 15-year period, from 0.10 percent in 1989 to 0.19 percent in 2003. As the population grew more obese, imaging problems grew, too. And obesity is certainly an even bigger factor now than it was in 2003.
New research is being done on how to improve quality imaging for obese patients, including this study about forgoing contrast agents in appendix CT scans of patients with abdominal girth of 105 cm or more.
While research and evelopment continues, radiology practices are left making hard decisions about risk and investments.
Does your practice limit obese patients? And where do you set the limit?
MRI-Based AI Radiomics Model Offers 'Robust' Prediction of Perineural Invasion in Prostate Cancer
July 26th 2024A model that combines MRI-based deep learning radiomics and clinical factors demonstrated an 84.8 percent ROC AUC and a 92.6 percent precision-recall AUC for predicting perineural invasion in prostate cancer cases.
Breast MRI Study Examines Common Factors with False Negatives and False Positives
July 24th 2024The absence of ipsilateral breast hypervascularity is three times more likely to be associated with false-negative findings on breast MRI and non-mass enhancement lesions have a 4.5-fold likelihood of being linked to false-positive results, according to new research.
Can Polyenergetic Reconstruction Help Resolve Streak Artifacts in Photon Counting CT?
July 22nd 2024New research looking at photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) demonstrated significantly reduced variation and tracheal air density attenuation with polyenergetic reconstruction in contrast to monoenergetic reconstruction on chest CT.