PACS installations in U.S. hospitals top 1300

Article

At least one-third of all U.S. hospitals have installed radiology PACS, and another 10% have installations pending, according to the Annual Report of the US Hospital IT Market released May 18 by the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society and HIMSS Analytics, its market research arm.

At least one-third of all U.S. hospitals have installed radiology PACS, and another 10% have installations pending, according to the Annual Report of the US Hospital IT Market released May 18 by the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society and HIMSS Analytics, its market research arm.

The report reflects 2004 and first quarter 2005 data from 3989 of the 5764 registered U.S. hospitals.

Another 32% of hospitals plan to purchase PACS for the first time, and the remaining 25% are not yet automated, the report said.

Approximately two-thirds of the facilities planning to purchase PACS plan to do so in the next two years. Most of the planned purchases are in the 100 to 399-bed range.

The percentage of PACS sites and pending installations breaks depending on institution size:

  • under 100 beds: 25%

  • 100 to 199 beds: 37%

  • 200 to 299 beds: 47%

  • 300 to 399 beds: 54%

  • 400 to 499 beds: 68%

  • 500 or more beds: 82%

Only 3% of large hospitals (500 or more beds) have no radiology PACS or plans to purchase one, compared with 43% of hospitals under 100 beds.

Half of all radiology PACS contracts were signed in 2003 (32%) and 2004 (18%), according to the report. It found that urban hospitals (36%) were more likely to have PACS solutions installed than rural (15%), and academic institutions (71%) more likely than nonacademic (30%).

"Radiology PACS penetration continues to progress well in hospitals due to its significant operational improvements relative to radiology services, although PACS/radiology information system integration and interoperability has still not attained the level of performance desired by radiology departments," the report concluded.

The report also stated that archival storage strategies for medical images are still immature and fragmented.

"This will become a critical issue as new generations of MRI and PET equipment generate significantly more images," it said.

Recent Videos
Study: MRI-Based AI Enhances Detection of Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer
What New Research Reveals About the Impact of AI and DBT Screening: An Interview with Manisha Bahl, MD
Can AI Assessment of Longitudinal MRI Scans Improve Prediction for Pediatric Glioma Recurrence?
A Closer Look at MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Monitoring and Treating Glioblastomas
Incorporating CT Colonography into Radiology Practice
What New Research Reveals About Computed Tomography and Radiation-Induced Cancer Risk
What New Interventional Radiology Research Reveals About Treatment for Breast Cancer Liver Metastases
New Mammography Studies Assess Image-Based AI Risk Models and Breast Arterial Calcification Detection
Can Deep Learning Provide a CT-Less Alternative for Attenuation Compensation with SPECT MPI?
Employing AI in Detecting Subdural Hematomas on Head CTs: An Interview with Jeremy Heit, MD, PhD
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.