PACS QA: What you see is what you beget

Article

Because quality criteria for PACS have not yet been standardized, institutions are left to wrestle with the components that contribute to systemwide quality mostly on their own.Understanding quality assurance of PACS workstations is especially

Because quality criteria for PACS have not yet been standardized, institutions are left to wrestle with the components that contribute to systemwide quality mostly on their own.

Understanding quality assurance of PACS workstations is especially important now that the trend away from CRT to LCD monitors has gathered steam.

"How you approach a flat-panel world is different from a CRT world," said Dr. Jeffrey B. Mendel, chair of radiology at Caritas St. Elizabeth Medical Center in Boston.

The types of artifacts that users run into with LCDs are different, and the causes and solutions are different, he said.

Many experts agree that flat panels will soon replace CRTs completely in PACS.

"We just put in a three-hospital PACS, and we have no CRTs whatsoever," Mendel said.

Mendel has given a PACS quality assurance course at the RSNA meeting the past few years. He advises institutions to carefully assess their monitor needs before beginning to shop for PACS.

If they then codify those needs into a document for doing acceptance testing, they will have a continuum - from what they are looking for to what they are contracting for to what they need to test for.

"They will then know that what they thought they were getting is what they got," Mendel said.

QA is also important because most PACS have both diagnostic-quality and clinical (nondiagnostic) workstations on their networks.

"Clinical workstations don't need to be dedicated, high-quality medical-grade monitors. But without an assessment of monitor needs before purchase to determine what criteria are actually needed, you can end up with videocards that can't be calibrated," he said. "So you can never make the images look good."

When that happens, clinicians sometimes pester radiologists because they don't have a monitor showing the detail they need for their own evaluations.

QA programs are also essential because monitor quality can degrade so gradually it may go unnoticed.

The joke is, the only time radiologists complain about monitor image quality is when they can't read the patient's name, Mendel said.

In order for radiologists to efficiently read eight hours a day off a PACS workstation, all quality measurements need to stay at a high level. Before PACS, radiologists could tell if a film was good quality just by looking at it. No more.

"With computer-based systems, it isn't enough to just look at the image to know whether the quality is there. To make sure you are getting the data, you need a rigorous QA program in place, to verify that the quality of the image you see is the best it can possibly be," Mendel said.

Recent Videos
Combining Advances in Computed Tomography Angiography with AI to Enhance Preventive Care
Study: MRI-Based AI Enhances Detection of Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer
What New Research Reveals About the Impact of AI and DBT Screening: An Interview with Manisha Bahl, MD
Can AI Assessment of Longitudinal MRI Scans Improve Prediction for Pediatric Glioma Recurrence?
A Closer Look at MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Monitoring and Treating Glioblastomas
Incorporating CT Colonography into Radiology Practice
What New Research Reveals About Computed Tomography and Radiation-Induced Cancer Risk
What New Interventional Radiology Research Reveals About Treatment for Breast Cancer Liver Metastases
New Mammography Studies Assess Image-Based AI Risk Models and Breast Arterial Calcification Detection
Can Deep Learning Provide a CT-Less Alternative for Attenuation Compensation with SPECT MPI?
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.