Because quality criteria for PACS have not yet been standardized, institutions are left to wrestle with the components that contribute to systemwide quality mostly on their own.Understanding quality assurance of PACS workstations is especially
Because quality criteria for PACS have not yet been standardized, institutions are left to wrestle with the components that contribute to systemwide quality mostly on their own.
Understanding quality assurance of PACS workstations is especially important now that the trend away from CRT to LCD monitors has gathered steam.
"How you approach a flat-panel world is different from a CRT world," said Dr. Jeffrey B. Mendel, chair of radiology at Caritas St. Elizabeth Medical Center in Boston.
The types of artifacts that users run into with LCDs are different, and the causes and solutions are different, he said.
Many experts agree that flat panels will soon replace CRTs completely in PACS.
"We just put in a three-hospital PACS, and we have no CRTs whatsoever," Mendel said.
Mendel has given a PACS quality assurance course at the RSNA meeting the past few years. He advises institutions to carefully assess their monitor needs before beginning to shop for PACS.
If they then codify those needs into a document for doing acceptance testing, they will have a continuum - from what they are looking for to what they are contracting for to what they need to test for.
"They will then know that what they thought they were getting is what they got," Mendel said.
QA is also important because most PACS have both diagnostic-quality and clinical (nondiagnostic) workstations on their networks.
"Clinical workstations don't need to be dedicated, high-quality medical-grade monitors. But without an assessment of monitor needs before purchase to determine what criteria are actually needed, you can end up with videocards that can't be calibrated," he said. "So you can never make the images look good."
When that happens, clinicians sometimes pester radiologists because they don't have a monitor showing the detail they need for their own evaluations.
QA programs are also essential because monitor quality can degrade so gradually it may go unnoticed.
The joke is, the only time radiologists complain about monitor image quality is when they can't read the patient's name, Mendel said.
In order for radiologists to efficiently read eight hours a day off a PACS workstation, all quality measurements need to stay at a high level. Before PACS, radiologists could tell if a film was good quality just by looking at it. No more.
"With computer-based systems, it isn't enough to just look at the image to know whether the quality is there. To make sure you are getting the data, you need a rigorous QA program in place, to verify that the quality of the image you see is the best it can possibly be," Mendel said.
ASCO: Study Reveals Significant Racial/Ethnic Disparities with PSMA PET Use for Patients with mPCa
May 30th 2025Latinx patients with metastatic prostate cancer were 63 percent less likely than non-Hispanic White patients to have PSMA PET scans, according to a study of 550 patients presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) conference.
Lunit Unveils Enhanced AI-Powered CXR Software Update
May 28th 2025The Lunit Insight CXR4 update reportedly offers new features such as current-prior comparison of chest X-rays (CXRs), acute bone fracture detection and a 99.5 percent negative predictive value (NPV) for identifying normal CXRs.
New MRI Study Questions Use of Corticosteroid Injections for Knee OA
May 27th 2025Two years after intraarticular knee injections for knee osteoarthritis (OA), study participants who had corticosteroid knee injections had greater OA progression than control patients while the use of hyaluronic acid injections was associated with less OA progression.