Radiology tests in emergency departments are most often requested by the patients, not the ordering physicians.
The amount of radiologic imaging ordered in the emergency department is driven largely by patients’ wishes - not the physicians’ - say the results of a study published online in the journal Radiology.
Imaging rates in emergency departments are quite variable, suggesting that physicians’ experience and training may play a role in how often these tests are ordered. To address this issue, researchers from Massachusetts General in Boston and the University of Florida in Gainesville undertook a study that analyzed ED visits to determine predictors for ordering a radiologic exam.
“A lot of literature on imaging variability can lead to a false assumption that doctors are primarily responsible,” lead author Christopher L. Sistrom, MD, MPH, PhD, said in a release. “The problem is that it is difficult to fully describe and quantify variability at the different levels it can occur.”
The researchers looked at 88,851 ED visits that occurred during 2011 at Massachusetts General Hospital. Using hierarchical logistic regression to identify multiple predictors of probability that imaging was ordered during a given visit, the researchers found that patient and visit factors were the predominant predictors that an imaging test would be performed.
“The key finding in our study is that doctors don’t make a difference in imaging utilization,” Sistrom said. He noted that doctors were responsible for only about a 1 percent variability in the probability of the patient undergoing an imaging exam.
The researchers also found that how busy an ED was played a role in the number of imaging tests ordered. In a quieter ED, the odds of low-cost imaging were 11 percent higher than the reference standard. A busier ED often ordered more higher-cost imaging.
Emerging AI Algorithm Shows Promise for Abbreviated Breast MRI in Multicenter Study
April 25th 2025An artificial intelligence algorithm for dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI offered a 93.9 percent AUC for breast cancer detection, and a 92.3 percent sensitivity in BI-RADS 3 cases, according to new research presented at the Society for Breast Imaging (SBI) conference.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current Perspectives on the Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Brain PET
March 18th 2025In a new podcast, Satoshi Minoshima, M.D., Ph.D., and James Williams, Ph.D., share their insights on the recently updated appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET and tau PET in patients with mild cognitive impairment.
Can Abbreviated Breast MRI Have an Impact in Assessing Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response?
April 24th 2025New research presented at the Society for Breast Imaging (SBI) conference suggests that abbreviated MRI is comparable to full MRI in assessing pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Clarius Mobile Health Unveils Anterior Knee Feature for Handheld Ultrasound
April 23rd 2025The T-Mode Anterior Knee feature reportedly offers a combination of automated segmentation and real-time conversion of grayscale ultrasound images into color-coded visuals that bolster understanding for novice ultrasound users.