Digital manipulation of images plays a key role in development of multimedia presentations for teaching and conferences. Taming commercially available tools for easy use by radiologists is therefore inspiring considerable effort. Two recent papers
Digital manipulation of images plays a key role in development of multimedia presentations for teaching and conferences. Taming commercially available tools for easy use by radiologists is therefore inspiring considerable effort.
Two recent papers report on strategies to demystify Photoshop for the nonexpert user.
Radiologists at the University of Louisville School of Medicine, led by Dr. Ronald D. Caruso and Dr. Gregory C. Postel, demonstrate basic techniques of editing gray-scale cross-sectional images intended for publication and for incorporation into computerized presentations (J Digit Imaging 2002 Nov 6; [epub ahead of print]). This is a follow-up to their earlier article (Radiographics 2002;22:993-1002) on image editing in Adobe Photoshop.
"Photoshop is a powerful tool for rapidly editing and annotating images for teaching files, presentations, Web postings, and publication," Caruso said.
Photoshop gives the radiologist maximum control over the appearance of the image and permits easy alteration of image file type, resolution, and file size.
"Its automation is particularly useful," he said.
In another report (Radiographics 2002;22:981-992), Frank M. Corl, a research associate in radiology at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, offers five basic steps to digitizing images and preparing them for publication and computer presentation:
?scanning
?correction
?editing and labeling
?saving files
?producing final output
"These steps can be completed with commercially available hardware and image manipulation software such as Photoshop," Corl said.
The higher the quality of the original scanned image, the more image data there will be to edit. A good image cannot be created from an inferior scan, he said.
"The most important functions for properly scanning images are size, resolution, and color," Corl said.
Resolutions of 300 ppi and 72 ppi should be used for print publication and computer presentations, respectively. The higher resolution image has the larger file size. The scanned image should be saved as a TIFF (tagged image file format), which is an uncompressed file type used for printed images, he said.
JPEG format compresses the size of the image file but also reduces image quality, according to Corl. The JPEG format is a good choice if a small file size is needed, as in Web and PowerPoint presentations.
"If the user needs to save an image as a JPEG file, the image should be edited first and then saved once in JPEG format," he said. "With Photoshop, the user can rotate and crop an image; adjust its brightness, contrast, and color; remove unwanted patient information, dust, and scratches; and add text and symbol labels to enhance images for teaching purposes."
Can Photon-Counting CT be an Alternative to MRI for Assessing Liver Fat Fraction?
March 21st 2025Photon-counting CT fat fraction evaluation offered a maximum sensitivity of 81 percent for detecting steatosis and had a 91 percent ICC agreement with MRI proton density fat fraction assessment, according to new prospective research.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current Perspectives on the Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Brain PET
March 18th 2025In a new podcast, Satoshi Minoshima, M.D., Ph.D., and James Williams, Ph.D., share their insights on the recently updated appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET and tau PET in patients with mild cognitive impairment.
Strategies to Reduce Disparities in Interventional Radiology Care
March 19th 2025In order to help address the geographic, racial, and socioeconomic barriers that limit patient access to interventional radiology (IR) care, these authors recommend a variety of measures ranging from increased patient and physician awareness of IR to mobile IR clinics and improved understanding of social determinants of health.
AI-Initiated Recalls After Screening Mammography Demonstrate Higher PPV for Breast Cancer
March 18th 2025While recalls initiated by one of two reviewing radiologists after screening mammography were nearly 10 percent higher than recalls initiated by an AI software, the AI-initiated recalls had an 85 percent higher positive predictive value for breast cancer, according to a new study.