The cost-effectiveness of installing a combined RIS/PACS is seldom easy to quantify. But now researchers from Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg in Germany believe they have found a way to assess the true financial impact of IT investment in a
The cost-effectiveness of installing a combined RIS/PACS is seldom easy to quantify. But now researchers from Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg in Germany believe they have found a way to assess the true financial impact of IT investment in a radiology department.
Complete evaluation of a system's cost-effectiveness should consist of three parts: capital investment, operating costs, and process costs, according to Christian Sprengel, from the university's Institute for Operations Research and Business Management in Halle. Hard data on the first two parts are often relatively easy to acquire, assuming relevant documentation is kept. But determining the financial impact of altering workflow is undoubtedly more complex, he told delegates at the June meeting of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery in London.
Sprengel described a five-stage approach designed to quantify cost-savings following installation of a RIS/PACS:
? analysis of time and cost per activity using paper-based workflow
? analysis of time and cost per activity following RIS/PACS implementation
? collation of data related to system investment
? collation of data related to operating costs
? detailed financial modeling
Activity costs can be derived by assigning separate workflow steps to different personnel categories, then calculating the time taken for employees to complete each of their functions, he said. Operating costs, on the other hand, relate to maintenance and support contracts, administrative expenses, costs of film and chemicals, and estimated depreciation of all equipment and devices.
The method has already been applied successfully to two hospitals in Germany, once prior to RIS/PACS purchase as a decision-making tool, and once as a retrospective analysis in a hospital where a RIS/PACS had been introduced in a stepwise fashion, Sprengel said. He showed a chart mapping data from the second project to show how cost savings increased as IT integration progressed.
"There are two things interesting to notice," he said. "First is that the RIS/PACS leads to a reduction in cost per process. The second is that the installation of the RIS alone is not very useful because there is no significant decrease in process costs. It is only in combination with the PACS that you get the better outcome."
He noted that the main activity-based savings come from the elimination of search, transport, and administrative activities once radiology departments use digital archiving for all images and reports. But realization of these savings requires the loss of administrative jobs or a shift in employee responsibilities toward more medical and technical activities.
European Society of Breast Imaging Issues Updated Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations
April 24th 2024One of the recommendations from the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) is annual breast MRI exams starting at 25 years of age for women deemed to be at high risk for breast cancer.
Study Reveals Benefits of Photon-Counting CT for Assessing Acute Pulmonary Embolism
April 23rd 2024In comparison to energy-integrating detector CT for the workup of suspected acute pulmonary embolism, the use of photon-counting detector CT reduced radiation dosing by 48 percent, according to newly published research.
Could a Newly FDA-Cleared C-Arm Device Bolster Efficiency for Interventional Radiologists?
April 22nd 2024In addition to advanced imaging quality and dose efficiency, the Philips Zenition 30 mobile C-arm device emphasizes personalized user profiles and automated customization to help reduce procedure time.