Unnecessary radiation exposure and burns during diagnostic radiology procedures ranked third on the ECRI Institute’s list of medical/technology hazards.
Unnecessary radiation exposure and radiation burns during diagnostic radiology procedures are ranked No. 3 on the ECRI Institute’s top 10 list of medical/technology hazards. A few of the other hazards listed, while not specific to radiology, are related to the field.
The quality of radiology procedures that use ionizing radiation often depends on the amount of radiation used - the higher the dose, the clearer the images. In addition, the ease at which many of these tests can be done may increase their use, even if other, non-radiation exposing tests may be as appropriate. These higher levels of radiation exposure by dose or by incidence can add up cumulatively, increasing cancer risk and, in some extreme situations, resulting in radiation burns, according to ECRI.
For this reason, the group suggested that certain questions be asked before ordering tests that use ionizing radiation:
• Is there another test that does not require ionizing radiation that would be as appropriate?
• If this is a repeat test, is it really necessary?
• Is the ALARA principle in use, using doses that are “as low as reasonably achievable” to acquire the desired diagnostic information?
• Are the screened areas limited to the area that must be screened?
• With fluoroscopic procedures, are skin dose levels being tracked?
In 2012, exposure to radiation therapy and CT ranked No. 2 on the top 10 list.
Adopting the Image Wisely campaign, an initiative of the American College of Radiology, the Radiological Society of North America, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine , and the American Society of Radiologic Technologists, would help facilities lower the amount of radiation used in medically necessary imaging studies and eliminate unnecessary procedures, the institute stated. Similarly, the Image Gently campaign, initiated by the Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging, aims to increase awareness of the opportunities to promote radiation protection in the imaging of children.
Other hazards on the list are not limited to diagnostic radiology but do affect the industry:
• Patient/data mismatches in electronic health records (EHR) and other IT systems, which can lead to the wrong patient receiving the wrong diagnosis and treatment;
• Interoperability failures with medical devices and health IT systems, which could mean system or management incompatibilities; and
• Inattention to the needs of pediatric patients when using “adult” technologies, seen when adult doses may be used for pediatric diagnostic testing.
The hazards met one or all of the following criteria: it has resulted in injury or death; it has occurred frequently; it can affect a large number of individuals; it is difficult to recognize; it's had high-profile, widespread news coverage.
The ECRI complements its annual hazards list with a web-based Health Technology Hazard Self-Assessment Tool, which provides a facility or department risk factor ratings of low, medium, or high related to each of the Top 10 hazards, as well as facility- and department-specific recommendations. This tool allows for prioritizing of efforts to address the hazards.
Can Photon-Counting CT be an Alternative to MRI for Assessing Liver Fat Fraction?
March 21st 2025Photon-counting CT fat fraction evaluation offered a maximum sensitivity of 81 percent for detecting steatosis and had a 91 percent ICC agreement with MRI proton density fat fraction assessment, according to new prospective research.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current Perspectives on the Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Brain PET
March 18th 2025In a new podcast, Satoshi Minoshima, M.D., Ph.D., and James Williams, Ph.D., share their insights on the recently updated appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET and tau PET in patients with mild cognitive impairment.
Strategies to Reduce Disparities in Interventional Radiology Care
March 19th 2025In order to help address the geographic, racial, and socioeconomic barriers that limit patient access to interventional radiology (IR) care, these authors recommend a variety of measures ranging from increased patient and physician awareness of IR to mobile IR clinics and improved understanding of social determinants of health.
AI-Initiated Recalls After Screening Mammography Demonstrate Higher PPV for Breast Cancer
March 18th 2025While recalls initiated by one of two reviewing radiologists after screening mammography were nearly 10 percent higher than recalls initiated by an AI software, the AI-initiated recalls had an 85 percent higher positive predictive value for breast cancer, according to a new study.