Using systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure values together results is a greater threshold for risk.
The threshold for risk associated with renal transplant biopsy is much greater when systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), or mean arterial (MAP) blood pressure are evaluated together.
In an award-winning poster presented during the ARRS 2021 Virtual Annual Meeting, Winston Wang, MS, from the Mayo Clinic Arizona detailed there is no statistically significant threshold for increased risk based on each of these values alone.
For more ARRS 2021 Virtual Annual Meeting conference coverage, click here.
“When these metrics are combined,” he said, ”the risk of complication is significantly higher when the SBP is ≥ 180 mm Hg, DBP is ≥ 95 mm Hg, and MAP is ≥ 116 mm Hg.”
For their study, Wang’s team reviewed consecutive ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsies conducted between Aug. 1, 2015, and July 31, 2017. They pulled pre-procedure data from each patient for SBP, DBP, and MAP. Developments of a major bleeding complication – denoted as Common Terminology Classification for Adverse Events grade 3 and above – were recorded in the electronic medical record, but there was no indication of a blood pressure threshold to cancel the biopsy, they said.
The team evaluated 1,689 biopsies from 958 patients – 547 men and 411 women -- and they discovered only 10 patients (0.59 percent) had bleeding complications. Their analysis showed there was no statistically significant difference between biopsies with complication and those without complication for SBP (p=0.351), DBP (p=0.088), or MAP (P=0.132).
The team did note that previous research has also indicated a slight correlation between major hemorrhagic complications of renal transplant biopsy and elevated SBP and DBP values when compared to patients who have normal-range blood pressure.
“The data is limited, based on only four complications,” they concluded.
For more coverage based on industry expert insights and research, subscribe to the Diagnostic Imaging e-Newsletter here.
Can Intestinal Ultrasound Provide an Alternative for Evaluating Creeping Fat with Crohn’s Disease?
September 25th 2024Intestinal ultrasound demonstrated an 88.2 percent agreement with computed tomography enterography in characterizing creeping fat in patients with Crohn’s disease, according to new research.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
Can Radiomics and Autoencoders Enhance Real-Time Ultrasound Detection of Breast Cancer?
September 10th 2024Developed with breast ultrasound data from nearly 1,200 women, a model with mixed radiomic and autoencoder features had a 90 percent AUC for diagnosing breast cancer, according to new research.
FDA Clears Controlled Contrast Delivery Method for Ultrasound Imaging of Fallopian Tubes
September 9th 2024Facilitating natural contrast delivery through an intrauterine catheter, FemChec can be utilized for ultrasound assessment of fallopian tubes and may provide diagnostic confirmation for an emerging non-surgical option for permanent birth control.