• AI
  • Molecular Imaging
  • CT
  • X-Ray
  • Ultrasound
  • MRI
  • Facility Management
  • Mammography

Stenting gives uneven aid to patients at risk of stroke


Only patients with severe intracranial arterial stenosis may benefit from prophylactic stenting, according to a study from China in the February issue of Neurology.

Only patients with severe intracranial arterial stenosis may benefit from prophylactic stenting, according to a study from China in the February issue of Neurology.

Evidence has been lacking to demonstrate that patients with symptomatic severe intracranial arterial stenosis faced a higher stroke risk after angioplasty and stenting than patients with moderate blockage disease. The latest study proved that patients in the former group actually benefit from preventive stenting, said Dr. Wei-Jian Jiang, an interventional neuroradiologist at the Capital University of Medical Sciences' Tiantan Hospital in Beijing.

The data also suggest, however, that patients in the latter group may not benefit at all, according to Jiang.

Jiang and colleagues assessed 213 patients, aged 20 to 79, who underwent prophylactic primary stenting of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis between September 2001 and June 2005. Of these, 121 patients had a stenosis degree above 70%. All others had a moderate to low artery blockage below 69%. The investigators found that neither group showed a significant difference in terms of their respective risk of having a stroke after stenting.

The study's primary endpoints included lesion-related ischemic stroke, symptomatic brain hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage after stenting. Ten endpoint events affected the severe stenosis group, with six occurring within 30 days of stenting and four during the follow-up period. Seven endpoint events affected the moderate group, four of which occurred within 30 days of stenting.

There was no significant difference in cumulative probability of primary endpoints between the severe (7.2% at one year and 8.2% at two years) stenosis group and the moderate (5.3% at one year and 8.3% at two years) group. No single factor was found to be associated with primary endpoints in the moderate stenosis group. Multivariable analysis revealed that stent failure was the only predictor of primary endpoints in the severe stenosis group.

Further research should establish the full benefit of stenting in patients with severe artery blockage before it can be used as a routine procedure, Jiang said. China's Ministry of Health supported the study.

For more information from the Diagnostic Imaging archives:

ISET meeting promises innovation, education - and football

Vessel analysis programs fall short in carotid measurement

Carotid stenting offers safe option in the elderly

The window expands for more effective stroke treatment

Carotid stenting improves cognition

Related Videos
Improving the Quality of Breast MRI Acquisition and Processing
Can Fiber Optic RealShape (FORS) Technology Provide a Viable Alternative to X-Rays for Aortic Procedures?
Does Initial CCTA Provide the Best Assessment of Stable Chest Pain?
Making the Case for Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Vascular Interventions
Can Diffusion Microstructural Imaging Provide Insights into Long Covid Beyond Conventional MRI?
Assessing the Impact of Radiology Workforce Shortages in Rural Communities
Emerging MRI and PET Research Reveals Link Between Visceral Abdominal Fat and Early Signs of Alzheimer’s Disease
Reimbursement Challenges in Radiology: An Interview with Richard Heller, MD
Nina Kottler, MD, MS
The Executive Order on AI: Promising Development for Radiology or ‘HIPAA for AI’?
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.