Quality improvement doesn’t necessarily have to slow things down, according to a new study in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Quality improvement doesn’t necessarily have to slow things down, according to a new study in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
A Stanford University team looking to measure the impact of their quality-control program on error rates in the generation of three-dimensional CT and MRI images found that not only did the program sharpen accuracy, but it also upped the radiology team’s productivity.
The team was led by Laura Pierce, RT, now administrative director of Duke University’s Multi-Dimensional Image Processing Laboratory. For three months, she and colleagues considered average error rates in reports by six 3-D technologists as the group went through error-reduction training. The team continued measuring error rates for nine months after the training.
The researchers saw a sharp drop in error rates – from 16.1 percent during the first three months to 7.2 percent during the nine-month follow-up. What’s more, the six technologists tackled a 7.6 percent average monthly increase in examination volume during those nine months, with a higher proportion of examinations having a turnaround time of four hours or less.
Technologists with more than four years’ experience did best, with average error rates of 5.2 percent, less than half the 10.6 percent among less-experienced technologists. But the training had a much greater impact on the inexperienced technologists, Pierce and colleagues found.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Current Perspectives on Radiology Workforce Issues and Potential Solutions
March 14th 2024Emphasizing the gravity of the ongoing workforce shortage in radiology, these authors recommend a change agenda focusing on expanded numbers of residency positions, reassessment of educational pathways, maintaining a strong presence in hospital settings and practice level initiatives to reduce administrative burden and achieve appropriate reimbursement beyond RVU measurements.
Could Cloud-Based 'Progressive Loading' be a Boon for Radiology Workflows?
March 13th 2024The newly launched Progressive Loading feature, available through RamSoft’s OmegaAI software, reportedly offers radiologist rapid uploading of images that is faster than on-site networks and other cloud-based systems regardless of the network radiologists are using.