System finds ways to limit image rejects

Article

Since vendors do not incorporate repeat analysis in their PACS products, imaging departments must devise their own mechanisms to record and analyze rejected images. This routine is necessary to provide objective data for training and process

Since vendors do not incorporate repeat analysis in their PACS products, imaging departments must devise their own mechanisms to record and analyze rejected images. This routine is necessary to provide objective data for training and process improvement.

Texas Children's Hospital (TCH) in Houston recently incorporated repeat/reject analysis into its PACS to improve the quality of diagnostic services, according to a report in a recent paper (J Digit Imag 2003;16:22-25).

The hospital hopes to achieve a better reject rate for 2003 than the department's 2002 average of 4.46%, which represented an increase over the 2001 rate of 4.07%.

"Although the magnitude of our reject rate is comparable with reports from other imaging departments, we believe we have opportunities to reduce it," said Melissa Blado, TCH PACS analyst team leader.

TCH uncovered several potential reasons that it suspects were the cause of the increase in repeat rates.

"Secondary to a staffing shortage, the department has been relying on temporary contract technologists," Blado said.

These contract technologists are less experienced with pediatric patients and with computed radiography equipment, and they have a higher turnover rate. New FTE technologists are also usually unfamiliar with CR technology and consequently generate more rejects, she said.

While repeat rates may never be reduced to zero, since technical errors will always occur with uncooperative patients and human operators, TCH is developing new training strategies to address areas of concern.

"Potential training venues include classes, in-service sessions, and open forums with technologists, our physicist, vendors, and PACS analysts," Blado said.

Areas of discussion will include shielding, how to identify artifacts on the processing station, positioning, and other topics as indicated by monthly repeat analysis reports developed by PACS analysts. Training or coaching will be used primarily to increase the awareness of the reports to the technologists as well as to open dialogue with the department, she said.

"With monthly meetings, training, and consistency of the imaging process, the number of repeats should be minimized," Blado said.

Recent Videos
Combining Advances in Computed Tomography Angiography with AI to Enhance Preventive Care
Study: MRI-Based AI Enhances Detection of Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer
What New Research Reveals About the Impact of AI and DBT Screening: An Interview with Manisha Bahl, MD
Can AI Assessment of Longitudinal MRI Scans Improve Prediction for Pediatric Glioma Recurrence?
A Closer Look at MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Monitoring and Treating Glioblastomas
Incorporating CT Colonography into Radiology Practice
What New Research Reveals About Computed Tomography and Radiation-Induced Cancer Risk
What New Interventional Radiology Research Reveals About Treatment for Breast Cancer Liver Metastases
New Mammography Studies Assess Image-Based AI Risk Models and Breast Arterial Calcification Detection
Can Deep Learning Provide a CT-Less Alternative for Attenuation Compensation with SPECT MPI?
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.