Technologists face strengthened error accountability rule

Article

A new rule in the ethics guidelines governing technologists will mandate that they immediately report errors to the appropriate supervisor. The change reflects the increased focus on accountability in healthcare in general and the emergence of “supertechs” in particular.

A new rule in the ethics guidelines governing technologists will mandate that they immediately report errors to the appropriate supervisor. The change reflects the increased focus on accountability in healthcare in general and the emergence of "supertechs" in particular.

The American Registry of Radiologic Technologists adopted the new rule as an interim measure last year to coincide with the first graduating class of Registered Radiologist Assistants (RAA), technologists with expanded responsibilities. The rule, open for public comment since then, will likely be formally adopted in July, according to Tom Kraker, ARRT assistant director.

Rule number 22 calls for RTs to immediately report information to their supervisors concerning an error made in connection with imaging, treating, or caring for a patient. Waiting a week to report such an incident would be in violation of the rule, Kraker said.

Technologist errors that the ARRT has had complaints about in the past include preparing the wrong substance for injection or having a contaminated sterile field. Errors must be reported whether or not they result in injury. Last year, the organization received and reviewed approximately 1900 complaints, filed by employers, state licensing agencies, police departments, the FDA, and coworkers. About 50 technologists were consequently sanctioned.

The types of sanctions range from reprimand to revocation:

  • public reprimand with no service limitations

  • ineligible for certification, permanent or time-limited

  • suspended registration for specified period

  • summary suspension, immediate and permanent

  • revocation, permanent or time-limited

A problem encountered by the ARRT has been hospitals allowing employees to resign, rather than be terminated for errors. The violation is closed to the public, and the ARRT doesn't have subpoena power to enforce its own disciplinary action.

"It's not fair to the public, because that individual can go across the street and get a job fairly quickly, without any scrutiny of his or her behavior," Kraker said.

For more information from the Diagnostic Imaging archives:

ARRT toasts milestone, tweaks MR and ultrasound certification

Saying 'I'm sorry' could stem tide of malpractice claims

Harmful errors in radiology suite top national database

Newsletter

Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.

Recent Videos
SNMMI: Emerging PET Insights on Neuroinflammation with Progressive Apraxia of Speech (PAOS) and Parkinson-Plus Syndrome
Improving Access to Nuclear Imaging: An Interview with SNMMI President Jean-Luc C. Urbain, MD, PhD
SNMMI: 18F-Piflufolastat PSMA PET/CT Offers High PPV for Local PCa Recurrence Regardless of PSA Level
SNMMI: NIH Researcher Discusses Potential of 18F-Fluciclovine for Multiple Myeloma Detection
SNMMI: What Tau PET Findings May Reveal About Modifiable Factors for Alzheimer’s Disease
Emerging Insights on the Use of FES PET for Women with Lobular Breast Cancer
Can Generative AI Reinvent Radiology Reporting?: An Interview with Samir Abboud, MD
Mammography Study Reveals Over Sixfold Higher Risk of Advanced Cancer Presentation with Symptom-Detected Cancers
Combining Advances in Computed Tomography Angiography with AI to Enhance Preventive Care
Study: MRI-Based AI Enhances Detection of Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.