Conventional radiography/fluoroscopyhas always been cumbersome.
Conventional radiography/fluoroscopy has always been cumbersome.
The equipment is big and bulky, and the examination is time-consuming, as technologists wrestle with cassettes between exposures and wait for film to develop.
The introduction of digital flatpanel detectors is not only streamlining the configuration of R/F rooms and simplifying throughput. It is also improving the detection of pathology, reducing radiation dose, and increasing patient comfort. It is assessing motion in real-time as well, so radiotherapy can be delivered in the highest tolerable dose to the most precisely defined tumor target.
Flat-panel detectors from major suppliers such as Varian and Trixell can be found in R/F systems by GE, Hitachi, Philips, Shimadzu, Siemens, and Toshiba.
One advantage of the digital flat panel is its large area. In contrast to image intensifiers, which have a maximum size of 16 inches, general-purpose flat-panel detectors are 14 x 17 or 17 x 17 inches. The larger coverage means fewer exposures and faster exam time.
“Doctors can catch live motion video, take exposures here and there, and do all of the spot filming they want on one exposure. Generally in the past, techs would have to step in and do a series of five or six exposures.
Imaging has gotten much faster because there is no cassette handling. Now the radiologist pushes a button, the exposure is made, and a few seconds later, the radiologist gets the image and can go on to the next. He or she doesn't have to switch between the radiography and fluoroscopy world,” said Tom Truesdell, manager of radiography/fluoroscopy for Siemens Medical Solutions. Speed means not only better throughput; it also improves lesion detection.
“The response time of a digital flatpanel R/F system is very fast. You are on rapid fire taking images. So you are more likely to capture the pathology you are seeking. You also know right away whether you have the image you want,” said Dr. Edward Lubat, managing partner of Radiology Associates of Ridgewood in Waldwick, NJ.
Unlike image intensifiers, which are not geometrically accurate and produce pincushion distortion at the edges, flat panels have uniform image quality from edge to edge. Flat-panel technology also has higher detective quantum efficiency (DQE) than image intensifier charge-coupled device camera systems, which translates into superior small area contrast resolution and improved visibility of small vessels and catheters, according to Dr. Rick Colbeth, vice president of flatpanel technology for Varian.
Flat-panel technology has greatly improved image quality on the fluoroscopy side. As a result, radiologists in Europe are finding that they can use lower-dose fluoroscopy and still capture diagnostic events without needing to switch to high-dose, highresolution radiography. Prof. Yvan Palmers, director of imaging services for Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg in Ghent, Belgium, has acquired a diagnostic- quality image in the fluoroscopy mode that used 30% of the radiation dose required by the traditional radiography mode.
Flat panels are smaller and lighter than image intensifier CCD camera systems, so digital R/F systems tend to be more maneuverable. Added space beneath the system allows the table to be lowered to a 19-inch height for easy and more comfortable patient transfers. Reduced ancillary equipment and increased distance between the table and the imaging tower facilitate patient positioning. If it weren't for flat-panel technology, real-time gating during imageguided radiation therapy would be impossible, said Dr. Todd Scarbrough, medical director of Melbourne Internal Medical Associates Cancer Center in Melbourne, FL.
Now that a flat-panel device has been attached to a linear accelerator, Scarbrough can track the movement of a fiducial metallic marker on the surface of a tumor as it moves with the respiratory cycle in order to synchronize the release of a beam of radiation.
“We can't move the radiation beam around, but we can find out where the tumor is and turn the beam on or off depending on the respiratory cycle. It's important for us to be exceedingly accurate with how we delivery radiotherapy, and flat-panel imaging lets us do that. It allows us to decrease side effects and go to a higher dose because we are confident about where the radiation is going,” Scarbrough said.
Can Portable Dual-Energy X-Ray be a Viable Alternative to CT in the ICU?
September 13th 2024The use of a portable dual-energy X-ray detector in the ICU at one community hospital reportedly facilitated a 37.5 percent decrease in chest CT exams in comparison to the previous three months, according to research presented at the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) meeting in Washington, D.C.
New Meta-Analysis Examines MRI Assessment for Treatment of Esophageal Cancer
September 12th 2024Diffusion-weighted MRI provided pooled sensitivity and specificity rates of 82 percent and 81 percent respectively for gauging patient response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer, according to new meta-analysis.
Study for Emerging PET/CT Agent Reveals ‘New Standard’ for Detecting Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
September 11th 2024Results from a multicenter phase 3 trial showed that the PET/CT imaging agent (89Zr)Zr-girentuximab had an 85.5 percent mean sensitivity rate for the diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Can Radiomics and Autoencoders Enhance Real-Time Ultrasound Detection of Breast Cancer?
September 10th 2024Developed with breast ultrasound data from nearly 1,200 women, a model with mixed radiomic and autoencoder features had a 90 percent AUC for diagnosing breast cancer, according to new research.