In our headlong rush into electronic medical records, a move fueled by $19 billion in stimulus money, we should heed some cautionary notes that are emerging as the transition from paper to digital takes place.
In our headlong rush into electronic medical records, a move fueled by $19 billion in stimulus money, we should heed some cautionary notes that are emerging as the transition from paper to digital takes place.
One of them comes from Pulse, a U.K. primary care publication run by Diagnostic Imaging's parent company, United Business Media. Last week, Pulse reported that up to 200,000 patients had been placed at risk by failure to properly update medical records in a national summary care records program. The program of the U.K.'s National Health Service aims to digitize health records and patient encounters so that the information is immediately available to members of the system for urgent or other care needs.
The goal is laudable, but the program has been controversial. A finding that 10% of 82,000 patient records under a pilot for the program contained errors in patients' medication or allergies certainly won't help. (The 200,000 figure was an extrapolation based on an enrollment of two million patients in the summary care records program.)
According to the article, the problem seems to have been that staff in the pilot didn't always have access to some of the NHS records they needed to make changes to the summary care records, which means they, in turn, were left out-of-date.
Obviously, in the U.S. we'll be looking at more narrowly targeted EMR programs than the U.K. effort, but even here, the risk of errors remains. Last year, I visited a specialist and we reviewed medication values entered in an electronic medical record by my primary care physician, who was in the same system. Some of the values were wrong. It wasn't a life-threatening mistake, but it was still a good thing we checked.
All of which goes to show that it's going to take a lot of work to make EMRs safe from human errors. Knowing that, caution needs to be the watchword.
MRI-Based AI Radiomics Model Offers 'Robust' Prediction of Perineural Invasion in Prostate Cancer
July 26th 2024A model that combines MRI-based deep learning radiomics and clinical factors demonstrated an 84.8 percent ROC AUC and a 92.6 percent precision-recall AUC for predicting perineural invasion in prostate cancer cases.
Breast MRI Study Examines Common Factors with False Negatives and False Positives
July 24th 2024The absence of ipsilateral breast hypervascularity is three times more likely to be associated with false-negative findings on breast MRI and non-mass enhancement lesions have a 4.5-fold likelihood of being linked to false-positive results, according to new research.
Can Polyenergetic Reconstruction Help Resolve Streak Artifacts in Photon Counting CT?
July 22nd 2024New research looking at photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) demonstrated significantly reduced variation and tracheal air density attenuation with polyenergetic reconstruction in contrast to monoenergetic reconstruction on chest CT.