Addressing Failed Patient Follow-Ups During the Pandemic
COVID-19 is an additional factor in patients shying away from follow-up exams. Nuance Communication’s Sander Kloet shares his perspectives from SIIM on addressing this issue.
One of the most widespread impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic has been the delayed study. For many patients, their screening or diagnostic studies have been put on hold for the foreseeable future. But, the postponement is more than a simple delay – it is a compounding factor that is starting to make an already existing problem worse.
It is no secret in the industry that patients who fail to arrive for follow-up care are a pervasive pain point for practices. Add in the delay, the risk, and the fear associated with the pandemic, and it is recipe for an even deeper drop in imaging volume.
Related Content: Contacting Patients About Abnormal Findings Isn’t Enough to Prompt Follow-Up
To help practices address this issue – and potentially side-step it – Diagnostic Imaging spoke with Sander Kloet, senior director of product management, diagnostics, for Nuance Communications about his session during Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2020 Virtual Meeting. Here, he shares his insights on the frequency of the problem during the pandemic, strategies facilities can use to reduce the impact of failed follow-ups, and proactive tactics practices can implement.
Possible Real-Time Adaptive Approach to Breast MRI Suggests ‘New Era’ of AI-Directed MRI
June 3rd 2025Assessing the simulated use of AI-generated suspicion scores for determining whether one should continue with full MRI or shift to an abbreviated MRI, the authors of a new study noted comparable sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for biopsies between the MRI approaches.
Mammography AI Platform for Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Gets FDA De Novo Authorization
June 2nd 2025Through AI recognition of subtle patterns in breast tissue on screening mammograms, the Clairity Breast software reportedly provides validated risk scoring for predicting one’s five-year risk of breast cancer.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Can Emerging AI Software Offer Detection of CAD on CCTA on Par with Radiologists?
May 14th 2025In a study involving over 1,000 patients who had coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) exams, AI software demonstrated a 90 percent AUC for assessments of cases > CAD-RADS 3 and 4A and had a 98 percent NPV for obstructive coronary artery disease.
Mammography Study Compares False Positives Between AI and Radiologists in DBT Screening
May 8th 2025For DBT breast cancer screening, 47 percent of radiologist-only flagged false positives involved mass presentations whereas 40 percent of AI-only flagged false positive cases involved benign calcifications, according to research presented at the recent American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) conference.
