• AI
  • Molecular Imaging
  • CT
  • X-Ray
  • Ultrasound
  • MRI
  • Facility Management
  • Mammography

Breast elasticity imaging improves specificity

Article

Elasticity imaging with ultrasound allows radiologists to accurately distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions, according to a study presented at the RSNA meeting on Monday. Researchers using the technique correctly identified both cancerous and benign lesions in nearly all of the cases studied.

Elasticity imaging with ultrasound allows radiologists to accurately distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions, according to a study presented at the RSNA meeting on Monday. Researchers using the technique correctly identified both cancerous and benign lesions in nearly all of the cases studied. "In our work, elasticity imaging has been found to have high specificity," said Dr. Richard G. Barr, a professor of radiology at Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine in Youngstown. "If our results can be reproduced in a large, multicenter trial, this technique could significantly reduce the number of breast biopsies required."Barr evaluated 166 lesions with a real-time, freehand, elasticity imaging technique. Images were obtained using modified Siemens Elegra or Antares ultrasound systems. (Barr is a consultant for Siemens.)

All solid lesions or complex cystic masses were biopsy proven or had been stable for two years. Barr recorded image characteristics for different pathology and measured lesions for the largest length on both the fundamental and the elasticity image. Lesions in which the elasticity image was smaller than the fundamental image were characterized as benign. Lesions in which the elasticity image was larger were characterized as malignant.Ultrasound-guided biopsies were performed on 123 lesions. Biopsy showed that elasticity imaging correctly identified all 17 malignant lesions and 105 of 106 benign lesions, for a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99%.While mammography remains the gold standard exam for breast cancer screening, screening with MRI or ultrasound may be more effective for high-risk patients or women with dense breast tissue. MRI and ultrasound depict more breast lesions than mammography but have low specificity, resulting in a high number of invasive biopsies. About 80% of breast lesions biopsied are found to be benign, according to the American Cancer Society. "Our ability to find lesions in the breast has increased significantly over the last 10 years but at the expense of an increased number of biopsies," Barr said. "This technique could significantly reduce the number of biopsies and increase the confidence of women that a detected lesion is truly benign."He anticipates that elasticity imaging will also help in cancer detection, but did not evaluate that capability for this study. The research will be expanded to an international, multicenter trial beginning in January 2007.

Recent Videos
Addressing the Early Impact of National Breast Density Notification for Mammography Reports
Where the USPSTF Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Fall Short: An Interview with Stacy Smith-Foley, MD
A Closer Look at MRI-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
Making the Case for Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Vascular Interventions
Can Diffusion Microstructural Imaging Provide Insights into Long Covid Beyond Conventional MRI?
Assessing the Impact of Radiology Workforce Shortages in Rural Communities
Emerging MRI and PET Research Reveals Link Between Visceral Abdominal Fat and Early Signs of Alzheimer’s Disease
Reimbursement Challenges in Radiology: An Interview with Richard Heller, MD
Nina Kottler, MD, MS
Radiology Challenges with Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Breast Implants
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.