Regarding "Breast tomosynthesis trials show promise" (May, page 42), I thought you might be interested in a brief history of the development of digital breast tomosynthesis.
Regarding "Breast tomosynthesis trials show promise" (May, page 42), I thought you might be interested in a brief history of the development of digital breast tomosynthesis.
The first I heard of the tomosynthesis technique was an article I read in 1978 (Radiology 1971;98:249-255). I thought it was very clever. When I saw how clear cancers were on specimen radiography (after they had been removed from the breast), I thought how much easier it would be to detect breast cancers if we could see them without the rest of the breast getting in the way. I was frustrated that we could not use the tomosynthesis technique to accomplish this. Unfortunately, there was no way at the time of recording the images and processing them to do tomosynthesis of the breast.
As digital detectors started to be built for mammography, I began to plan for doing tomosynthesis of the breast. In 1992, we were joined by Loren Niklason, Ph.D., who became our physicist. I showed him the article and told him that I wanted to do tomosynthesis of the breast. When Niklason, Richard Moore, my head of research, and I met with GE, Fischer, radiologists from North Carolina and Thomas Jefferson, and physicists from Sunnybrook in Canada to develop and promote digital mammography, we recognized that the detector that GE was building would be ideally suited for tomosynthesis. As a result, MGH partnered with GE, while Dr. Stephen Feig at Thomas Jefferson partnered with Fischer. Loren, his wife, and another physicist worked out the physics, and we asked GE if they would help us motorize the x-ray tube so that we could do tomo.
GE was highly skeptical, so MGH got the patent on the system. We proved the concept by moving the tube by hand. With GE we received a grant from the Army that paid GE over $1 million to build us a prototype, which we used in our pilot studies of 450 women.
We were also responsible for pushing Lorad to do tomosynthesis. We also spoke to Siemens and most of the other mammography companies about the importance of digital breast tomosynthesis.
I have never been interested in accolades, but I do feel strongly about facts. DBT for screening the entire breast was first conceived at the MGH, designed, put to practice, and proven here. History should reflect the facts.
-Daniel B. Kopans, M.D.
Professor of radiology, Harvard Boston, MA
European Society of Breast Imaging Issues Updated Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations
April 24th 2024One of the recommendations from the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) is annual breast MRI exams starting at 25 years of age for women deemed to be at high risk for breast cancer.
New Research Examines Socioeconomic Factors with Mammography No-Shows
April 10th 2024Patients with Medicaid or means-tested insurance were over 27 percent more likely to miss mammography appointments, and only 65 percent of women with three of more adverse social determinants of health had a mammography exam in a two-year period covering 2020 and 2021, according to new research and a report from the CDC.
Mammography Study: AI Improves Breast Cancer Detection and Reduces Reading Time with DBT
April 3rd 2024An emerging artificial intelligence (AI) model demonstrated more than 12 percent higher specificity and reduced image reading time by nearly six seconds in comparison to unassisted radiologist interpretation of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images.