Manufacturers and users of low-field MRI scanners will probablydodge a bullet this month that could have been fatal for low-fieldreimbursement in California's workers' compensation system. Membersof a medical council participating in reform of the system
Manufacturers and users of low-field MRI scanners will probablydodge a bullet this month that could have been fatal for low-fieldreimbursement in California's workers' compensation system. Membersof a medical council participating in reform of the system areon the verge of abandoning a proposal to deny reimbursement forscans done on low-field systems.
The proposal to refuse low-field coverage was proffered asa means of reducing workers' comp costs. The system paid an estimated$266 million to radiologists last year (SCAN 10/21/92). MRI scansconstitute one of the fastest growing cost segments within radiology.
Low-field MRI has been singled out for attention because insurancecompanies participating in the system claimed that a disproportionatenumber of low-field scans must be repeated due to poor image quality.
Last year, members of the Industrial Medical Council (IMC),a group of physicians formed to make recommendations on workers'comp coverage, floated a trial balloon proposing that the systemno longer reimburse for low-field MRI scans.
Fortunately for low-field vendors and users, however, thatproposal has been withdrawn. Instead, the IMC will probably recommendthat the workers' comp system deny reimbursement for scans thatare not of acceptable quality. The interpreting radiologist willdetermine whether or not scans are acceptable, according to Dr.Michael M. Bronshvag, the IMC member who is conducting the reviewof low-field MRI reimbursement.
"The responsibility of the IMC is to worry about the patient,not the magnet," Bronshvag told SCAN. "We will probablycome out with different guidelines based on quality assurancefor the patient and let the radiologists and everybody else worryabout the magnet."
Bronshvag will make his recommendation on MRI coverage to afull meeting of the IMC in Los Angeles Feb. 18. The IMC will inturn make its own recommendations to the judges who set workers'comp rates. Those rates will be included in the revised workers'comp fee schedule to be published sometime this year.
The IMC meeting is public and will be held at 10 a.m. at theHoliday Inn Crown Plaza Hotel at the Los Angeles InternationalAirport, 5985 W. Century Blvd.
Where Things Stand with the Radiologist Shortage
June 18th 2025A new report conveys the cumulative impact of ongoing challenges with radiologist residency positions, reimbursement, post-COVID-19 attrition rates and the aging of the population upon the persistent shortage of radiologists in the United States.
How to Successfully Launch a CCTA Program at Your Hospital or Practice
June 11th 2025Emphasizing increasing recognition of the capability of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the evaluation of acute and stable chest pain, this author defuses common misperceptions and reviews key considerations for implementation of a CCTA program.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Mammography AI Platform for Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Gets FDA De Novo Authorization
June 2nd 2025Through AI recognition of subtle patterns in breast tissue on screening mammograms, the Clairity Breast software reportedly provides validated risk scoring for predicting one’s five-year risk of breast cancer.