Study finds PET no better than SPECT

Article

Positron emission tomography (PET) is no better than single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the evaluation of ischemic heart disease, according to a technology assessment published by ECRI.The study, sponsored by the Plymouth Meeting,

Positron emission tomography (PET) is no better than single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the evaluation of ischemic heart disease, according to a technology assessment published by ECRI.

The study, sponsored by the Plymouth Meeting, PA-based nonprofit group, concluded that PET images provide better contrast and spatial resolution than SPECT in assessments of myocardial blood flow and viability. The group found that the difference had little effect on clinicians' ability to diagnose coronary artery disease, however.

The study concluded that there is some question as to when PET's expense and clinical value justify its use over SPECT. The study was prepared by ECRI's Health Technology Assessment Information Service.

Recent Videos
Study: MRI-Based AI Enhances Detection of Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer
What New Research Reveals About the Impact of AI and DBT Screening: An Interview with Manisha Bahl, MD
Can AI Assessment of Longitudinal MRI Scans Improve Prediction for Pediatric Glioma Recurrence?
A Closer Look at MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Monitoring and Treating Glioblastomas
Incorporating CT Colonography into Radiology Practice
What New Research Reveals About Computed Tomography and Radiation-Induced Cancer Risk
What New Interventional Radiology Research Reveals About Treatment for Breast Cancer Liver Metastases
New Mammography Studies Assess Image-Based AI Risk Models and Breast Arterial Calcification Detection
Can Deep Learning Provide a CT-Less Alternative for Attenuation Compensation with SPECT MPI?
Employing AI in Detecting Subdural Hematomas on Head CTs: An Interview with Jeremy Heit, MD, PhD
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.