Women with uterine fibroids and Medicaid coverage are significantly more likely to be treated with uterine artery embolization than those with commercial insurance, according to newly published research.
New research suggests that insurance coverage and reimbursement do have a significant impact upon treatment decisions and referrals for women with uterine fibroids.
For a retrospective study, recently published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology, researchers reviewed data for 579,153 hysterectomy, myomectomy, and minimally invasive uterine artery embolization (UAE) procedures performed for the treatment of uterine fibroids between October 2015 and September 2023. The cohort included women between the ages of 30 and 59, according to the study.
In a multivariable analysis, the study authors found that women with Medicaid coverage were 38 percent more likely to have a UAE procedure than women with commercial insurance. However, in states that offered higher Medicaid reimbursement for hysterectomy procedures, the researchers noted that women with Medicaid were five percent less likely to have UAE procedures.
In new research assessing the impact of insurance coverage on the management of patients with uterine fibroids, researchers found that women with Medicaid coverage were 38 percent more likely to have a UAE procedure than women with commercial insurance. However, in states that offered higher Medicaid reimbursement for hysterectomy procedures, women with Medicaid were five percent less likely to have UAE procedures. (Image courtesy of Adobe Stock.)
“Regarding the treat-or-refer decision, our results suggest that gynecologists have higher odds of treating commercial patients and referring lower-reimbursement Medicaid patients to an interventional radiologist for a UAE,” wrote lead study author Pratik A. Shukla, M.D., an associate professor within the Division of Interventional Radiology in the Department of Radiology at the Rutgers New Jersey Medical School in Newark, N.J., and colleagues.
“As support for the influence of reimbursement, we found that women in states with higher Medicaid reimbursement for a laparoscopic hysterectomy were less likely to receive a UAE compared with women in lower-Medicaid-reimbursement states.”
The researchers added that women in micropolitan areas or small/rural communities were 61 percent and 42 percent less likely, respectively, to be treated with UAE. Women residing in the highest income quartile communities were 35 percent more likely to have UAE procedures in comparison to those residing in the lowest income quartile areas, according to the study authors.
When women had hysterectomy or myomectomy, the researchers found that those with Medicaid coverage were 20 percent less likely to have less invasive laparoscopic procedures than those with commercial insurance.
“That Medicaid patients with a hysterectomy or myomectomy are less likely to receive it laparoscopically than commercial patients is consistent with the incentives associated with reimbursement differences between Medicaid and commercial patients and access to care,” emphasized Shukla and colleagues. “Further, it is consistent with studies showing that newer technology procedures and greater access to surgical capability are higher in areas with more commercial patients.”
(Editor’s note: For related content, see “Survey Shows Lack of Awareness for Uterine Fibroid Embolization Procedure Commonly Performed by Interventional Radiologists,” “Ultrasound-Derived Fibroid Mapping Technology Gets FDA Nod” and “What a Transvaginal Ultrasound Study Reveals About Fibroid Prevalence in Minority Women.”)
In regard to study limitations, the authors acknowledged the proprietary nature of commercial reimbursement rates precluded a comparison of Medicaid and commercial reimbursement for UAE. Noting limitations with the diversity of the cohort, the researchers that the impacts of race and ethnicity upon UAE referral patterns were not explored in this study.
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
The Reading Room Podcast: A Closer Look at Remote MRI Safety, Part 3
August 1st 2025In the third of a three-part podcast episode, Emanuel Kanal, M.D. and Tobias Gilk, MRSO, MRSE, discuss strategies for maintaining the integrity of time-out procedures and communication with remote MRI scanning.
The Reading Room Podcast: A Closer Look at Remote MRI Safety, Part 2
August 1st 2025In the second of a multi-part podcast episode, Emanuel Kanal, M.D. and Tobias Gilk, MRSO, MRSE, share their perspectives on remote MRI safety protocols for ensuring screening accuracy and adherence to conditional implant guidelines as well as a rapid and effective response to adverse events.