"Treatment changes occur not only in patients with high-risk disease but also in a substantial subset of patients with intermediate-risk disease — particularly those with unfavorable features such as high PSA density and suggestive DRE findings — with patient selection feasible using clinical parameters and mpMRI."
In cases involving PSMA PET/CT influenced treatment plan changes, the researchers pointed out that these patients had more suggestive findings from digital rectal exams (DREs), higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and higher PI-RADS scores. Multivariable analysis indicated that patients with suggestive DRE findings and elevated PSA density were nearly 2.5-times more likely to have treatment plan changes influenced by PSMA PET/CT, according to the researchers.
Using triple biopsy as a reference standard, researchers noted a 16 percent higher sensitivity rate for PSMA PET/CT in comparison to mpMRI for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (98 percent vs. 82 percent). However, they also pointed a 55 percent higher specificity rate for mpMRI (60 percent vs. 5 percent).
“Its limited specificity and negative predictive value constrain its utility as a standalone, upfront imaging modality. Therefore, despite growing evidence supporting PSMA PET/CT for local tumor characterization, further refinement remains necessary,” added Krausewitz and colleagues.
Three Key Takeaways
• Early PSMA PET/CT influences management. Incorporating PSMA PET/CT prior to biopsy altered treatment plans in approximately one-third (34 percent) of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients, impacting surgical and radiation planning beyond mpMRI findings.
• Improved sensitivity but lower specificity. PSMA PET/CT showed higher sensitivity for clinically significant prostate cancer (98 percent vs. 82 percent) compared to mpMRI, though mpMRI maintained much higher specificity (60 percent vs. 5 percent), underscoring complementary rather than standalone use.
• Added value in equivocal or negative mpMRI cases. PSMA PET/CT detected csPCa in 22 percent of patients with negative or inconclusive mpMRI, highlighting its potential role in guiding biopsy decisions for patients with persistent clinical suspicion.
The study findings also revealed that the combined use of mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT yielded an 89 percent detection rate for csPCa. Researchers also noted that PSMA PET/CT identified csPCa in 22 percent of cases with negative or unequivocal findings on mpMRI.
“Consistent with prior studies, our data highlight that in challenging cases with negative or inconclusive MRI but persistent clinical suggestion, PSMA PET/CT provides additional information to guide biopsy decisions,” maintained Krausewitz and colleagues.
(Editor’s note: For related content, see “Nine Takeaways from New Review of PSMA PET/CT and Whole-Body MRI for Advanced Prostate Cancer,” “Meta-Analysis Shows Benefits of PSMA PET in Detecting Recurrence and Metastasis with PCa” and “Study Emphasizes PSA and PSMA PET Tumor Volume Assessment for Predicting mHSPC Progression After Apalutamide and ADT.”)
In regard to study limitations, the authors cautioned against broad extrapolation of the findings with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT to other PSMA-based tracers. They also acknowledged the lack of follow-up data to assess the impact of the initial PSMA PET/CT on long-term treatment outcomes. The researchers also noted that limited access, increased costs and increased diagnostic workload may thwart wider adoption of PSMA PET/CT.