There are few buzzwords likelier to get a strong reaction from radiologists than the one mentioned above. Bring it up, and folks can get animated, agitated, or downright angry. Part of what makes this such a tinderbox is that “teleradiology” refers to a heterogeneous group of entities, and it’s easy to dismiss them all with a single condemning sweep of the hand.
There are few buzzwords likelier to get a strong reaction from radiologists than the one mentioned above. Bring it up, and folks can get animated, agitated, or downright angry. Terms like “commoditization” and “predatory competition” follow, and the tone is often one of us-versus-them.
Part of what makes this such a tinderbox is that “teleradiology” refers to a heterogeneous group of entities, and it’s easy to dismiss them all with a single condemning sweep of the hand. However, a signed, formal report of a 2AM study from an ABR-certified, fellowship-trained radiologist with multiple state licensures should not be tarred with the same brush as a one-sentence “prelim” assessment generated by a mysterious individual on another continent with neither verifiable credentials nor any lasting accountability for his work.
Economics provide another major flashpoint. Simply put, teleradiology allows more competition into local markets for imaging services, and nobody likes the idea of being underbid or outperformed. It can be tempting to convince others (or ourselves) that such potential competitors are inherently flawed, and should thus be hobbled or entirely prevented from competing. Such machinations can be easier than, say, working to make one’s own operation more competitive.
Despite such efforts, teleradiology has grown and prospered. Why? Business basics: Supply and demand, not just in terms of imaging-studies and their interpretations but also referring to the teleradiologists themselves. A prospective telerad may have a number of demands that aren’t being supplied by local brick-and-mortar jobs in hospitals or imaging centers-a desire for specific or flexible hours, reluctance or inability to commute, etc. Maybe the telerad got sick of departmental politics, or the interruptions and aggravations of working in an office; s/he just wants to be left alone to read studies.
There’s another motivation to seek telerad work: Compensation for productivity. With most conventional radiology jobs, one negotiates a salary in advance. Adjustments (“bonuses”), if any, for the amount of work one actually does tend to be small relative to the salary itself…and if senior members of the team appear to be earning more while doing less, it can be frustrating for the hardworking junior staff. With telerad, there’s more of an “eat what you kill” system, and one can find one’s own balance between work and reward.
For those still wishing to keep the teleradiology-wave from encroaching their own turf, there have been more than a few write-ups on the subject already. You know the drill: Cover your own call-shifts, be available to your referrers, provide tip-top service so your customers don’t even think of going elsewhere, etc. Consider another angle, however: Try using honey instead of vinegar to keep some of your would-be telerads from going that route. Listen to what they want from their workplace. Don’t be rigidly adherent to your ideas about when and how they should be working, or how they should be paying their dues with blood, sweat, and tears like you remember doing, back in your day. If it’s “my way or the highway,” some folks will opt for the latter.
Burnout in Radiology: Key Risk Factors and Promising Solutions
June 9th 2025Recognizing the daunting combination of increasing imaging volume and workforce shortages, these authors discuss key risk factors contributing to burnout and moral injury in radiology, and potential solutions to help preserve well-being among radiologists.
Mammography AI Platform for Five-Year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Gets FDA De Novo Authorization
June 2nd 2025Through AI recognition of subtle patterns in breast tissue on screening mammograms, the Clairity Breast software reportedly provides validated risk scoring for predicting one’s five-year risk of breast cancer.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Can Emerging AI Software Offer Detection of CAD on CCTA on Par with Radiologists?
May 14th 2025In a study involving over 1,000 patients who had coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) exams, AI software demonstrated a 90 percent AUC for assessments of cases > CAD-RADS 3 and 4A and had a 98 percent NPV for obstructive coronary artery disease.
Could AI-Powered Abbreviated MRI Reinvent Detection for Structural Abnormalities of the Knee?
April 24th 2025Employing deep learning image reconstruction, parallel imaging and multi-slice acceleration in a sub-five-minute 3T knee MRI, researchers noted 100 percent sensitivity and 99 percent specificity for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears.