Ultrasounds accurate for initial screening for kidney stones.
Ultrasounds are as accurate as CT scans in detecting kidney stones, according to an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Researchers from the University of California, San Francisco conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing ultrasonography with CT in detection of kidney stones. A total of 2,759 patients (aged 18 to 76) participated in the trial; 908 were randomized to point-of-care ultrasonography, 893 to radiology ultrasonography, and 958 to abdominal CT. The point-of-care ultrasounds were performed by emergency room physicians. Some patients who were first examined with ultrasound did receive a follow-up CT exam at the physician's discretion.
Patients were contacted at 3, 7, 30, 90, and 180 days after randomization to assess study outcomes.
Three primary outcomes were identified for the study:
• High-risk diagnoses with complications that could be related to missed or delayed diagnoses;
• Cumulative radiation exposure from imaging;
• Total costs.
Secondary outcomes were:
[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_crop","fid":"27847","attributes":{"alt":"","class":"media-image media-image-right","id":"media_crop_7083930268562","media_crop_h":"0","media_crop_image_style":"-1","media_crop_instance":"2761","media_crop_rotate":"0","media_crop_scale_h":"0","media_crop_scale_w":"0","media_crop_w":"0","media_crop_x":"0","media_crop_y":"0","style":"border-style: solid; line-height: 25.0078811645508px; height: 151px; width: 100px; float: right;","title":"Rebecca Smith-Bindman, senior author, University of California, San Francisco","typeof":"foaf:Image"}}]]
• Serious adverse events;
• Related serious adverse events;
• Pain;
• Return emergency department visits;
• Hospitalizations;
• Diagnostic accuracy.
The results showed that the incidence of high-risk diagnoses with complications in the first 30 days was low (0.4%) and did not vary according to imaging method. In addition, the mean six-month cumulative radiation exposure was significantly lower in the ultrasonography groups.
All groups had similar rates of adverse events, average pain score, return emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and diagnostic accuracy.
"Ultrasound is the right place to start," senior study author Rebecca Smith-Bindman, MD, professor in the departments of radiology, epidemiology and biostatistics, and obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive medicine, UC San Francisco, said in a release. "Radiation exposure is avoided, without any increase in any category of adverse events, and with no increase in cost."
The authors concluded that ultrasounds should be used for initial diagnostic imaging, following up with CT if the physician feels it is warranted.
Study Reveals Benefits of Photon-Counting CT for Assessing Acute Pulmonary Embolism
April 23rd 2024In comparison to energy-integrating detector CT for the workup of suspected acute pulmonary embolism, the use of photon-counting detector CT reduced radiation dosing by 48 percent, according to newly published research.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
New AI-Powered Ultrasound Devices May Enhance Efficiency in Women's Imaging
April 19th 2024One of the features on the new Voluson Signature 20 and 18 ultrasound devices reportedly uses automated AI tools to facilitate a 40 percent reduction in the time it takes to perform second trimester exams.