Using automated dose tracking software allows clinicians to monitor the radiation doses used in the clinical setting.
Automated dose tracking software provides an effective and easy way of monitoring radiation dose exposure in a busy academic practice, according to a study presented today at the 2014 ARRS Annual Meeting in San Diego, Calif.
Researchers from Massachusetts General Hospital in Dorchester performed a retrospective study to evaluate the applicability of dose tracking software for monitoring radiation dose in routine non-contrast abdominal CT exams and the impact of various commercially available iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms on image quality and dose reduction. Twelve scanners were from GE, three from Siemens and two from Philips.
“A busy practice with diverse CT technology and remote scanner locations encounters challenges in assessing institutional performance in lowering radiation doses,” coauthor Yasir Andrabi said in a release. “Software-based dose monitoring simplifies the complex and essential quality and safety assurance with CT scanning irrespective of the scanner location.”
The researchers assessed all CT exams performed between December 2012 and August 2013 on 17 scanners, retrieved using eXposureTM software. Out of 83,350 CT exams, 25,530 exams (31 percent) were performed for GI/GU indications. Using the software, the researchers further tracked the dose profiles of 1,450 non-contrast abdominal exams performed for various indications and relevant radiation dose information was evaluated to track radiation dose patterns.
Dose variability within scanners:
Dose variability between reconstruction algorithms:
Dose variability within iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms:
“Dose tracking software provides an effective and easy way of monitoring radiation dose exposure in a busy academic practice,” the researchers concluded. “IR irrespective of manufacturer significantly reduce radiation dose in abdominal CT exams.”
What is the Best Use of AI in CT Lung Cancer Screening?
April 18th 2025In comparison to radiologist assessment, the use of AI to pre-screen patients with low-dose CT lung cancer screening provided a 12 percent reduction in mean interpretation time with a slight increase in specificity and a slight decrease in the recall rate, according to new research.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
Can CT-Based AI Radiomics Enhance Prediction of Recurrence-Free Survival for Non-Metastatic ccRCC?
April 14th 2025In comparison to a model based on clinicopathological risk factors, a CT radiomics-based machine learning model offered greater than a 10 percent higher AUC for predicting five-year recurrence-free survival in patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).
Could Lymph Node Distribution Patterns on CT Improve Staging for Colon Cancer?
April 11th 2025For patients with microsatellite instability-high colon cancer, distribution-based clinical lymph node staging (dCN) with computed tomography (CT) offered nearly double the accuracy rate of clinical lymph node staging in a recent study.