CAD May Found Missed Pulmonary Emboli
Pulmonary emboli missed by CT angiography may be detected by computer aided detection programs.
Pulmonary embolism-computer aided detection (PE-CADx) was able to correctly identify 77.4 percent of cases of acute PE that were previously missed in clinical practice, according to a study published in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Researchers from the University of Maryland School of Medicine in Baltimore undertook a retrospective study to assess the use of a PE-CADx program in the detection of pulmonary emboli that may have been missed in clinical practice.
A total of 6,769 pulmonary CT angiography (CTA) studies performed between January 2009 and July 2012 were identified for the study and assessed by a thoracic radiologist. When studies positive for PE were identified, all prior contrast-enhanced CTA studies were reviewed. Three thoracic radiologists assessed the presence, proximal extent, and number of PEs.
Studies with missed acute PE and available slice thickness of 2 mm or less were assessed with a prototype PE-CADx program. False-positive PE-CADx marks were analyzed. Outcomes of missed acute PEs were assessed in patients with both follow-up imaging and clinical data.
The researchers found that 53 studies with overlooked PE fit the inclusion criteria for PE-CADx assessment. The program then found at least one PE in 41 of the 53 cases (77.4 percent). Using PE-CADx, the radiologists correctly marked at least one PE all cases where there were multiple PEs (23 of 23) and 18 of 30 (60 percent) cases with a solitary PE.
The PE-CADx per-study sensitivity was significantly higher for segmental (65.5 percent) than for subsegmental (91.7 percent) PEs. PE-CADx averaged 3.8 false-positive marks per case (range, 0–23 marks). Fourteen patients with missed PE who were not receiving anticoagulation therapy developed new PEs, including nine with an isolated subsegmental PE on the initial CT scan.
Newsletter
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current and Emerging Insights on Abbreviated Breast MRI, Part 2
July 23rd 2025In the second part of a multi-part podcast episode, Stamatia Destounis, MD, Emily Conant, MD and Habib Rahbar, MD, discuss key sequences for abbreviated breast MRI and how it stacks up to other breast cancer screening modalities.
Considering Breast- and Lesion-Level Assessments with Mammography AI: What New Research Reveals
June 27th 2025While there was a decline of AUC for mammography AI software from breast-level assessments to lesion-level evaluation, the authors of a new study, involving 1,200 women, found that AI offered over a seven percent higher AUC for lesion-level interpretation in comparison to unassisted expert readers.
Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography be a Viable Screening Alternative to Breast MRI?
June 17th 2025While the addition of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) led to over a 13 percent increase in false positive cases, researchers also noted over double the cancer yield per 1,000 women in comparison to DBT alone.
