Radiologists can boost patient safety without significantly affecting the quality of the images by cutting the dose of contrast media in coronary CT angiography, according to a new study in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Radiologists can boost patient safety without significantly affecting the quality of the images by cutting the dose of contrast media in coronary CT angiography, according to a new study in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
An analysis of 108 CT angiography studies done using a 320-detector-row CT scanner found that a contrast media protocol based on 60 milliliters of iopamidol “had sufficient enhancement in more than 96 percent of coronary segments,” said Frank Rybicki, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, and one of the authors of the study.
Many centers use a higher iodine load, one comparable to 80 milliliters of iopamidol, the study’s authors said. It’s overkill, the study found.
All patients were imaged with a standardized protocol: iopamidol 370 followed by 40 mL of saline, both administered at a rate of 6 mL/s. Two radiologists assessed image quality throughout the coronary arteries. While those receiving the equivalent of 80 milliliters of iopamidol had slightly better image quality, the extra contrast, Rybicki said, “means unnecessary costs and increased risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) to the patients.” The risk of CIN is of special concern for these patients because they commonly have a renal insufficiency, a major risk factor for CIN, he added.
The analysis of patients with body mass indexes greater than 30 found that 92 percent of coronary segments had sufficient enhancement, which Rybicki said supports the general use of 60 milliliters of iopamidol for CT angiography done on 320 detector row CT scanners.
What is the Best Use of AI in CT Lung Cancer Screening?
April 18th 2025In comparison to radiologist assessment, the use of AI to pre-screen patients with low-dose CT lung cancer screening provided a 12 percent reduction in mean interpretation time with a slight increase in specificity and a slight decrease in the recall rate, according to new research.
The Reading Room: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer Screenings, and COVID-19
November 3rd 2020In this podcast episode, Dr. Shalom Kalnicki, from Montefiore and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, discusses the disparities minority patients face with cancer screenings and what can be done to increase access during the pandemic.
Can CT-Based AI Radiomics Enhance Prediction of Recurrence-Free Survival for Non-Metastatic ccRCC?
April 14th 2025In comparison to a model based on clinicopathological risk factors, a CT radiomics-based machine learning model offered greater than a 10 percent higher AUC for predicting five-year recurrence-free survival in patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).
Could Lymph Node Distribution Patterns on CT Improve Staging for Colon Cancer?
April 11th 2025For patients with microsatellite instability-high colon cancer, distribution-based clinical lymph node staging (dCN) with computed tomography (CT) offered nearly double the accuracy rate of clinical lymph node staging in a recent study.