When radiologists participate in collaborative care, patient care improves.
Collaborative radiology utilization management programs have substantial impact on patient care, regardless of provider specialty, according to a study published in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Researchers from the Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, in Philadelphia, PA, undertook a five-year project to evaluate the impact of such programs on the disposition of cases according to provider specialty. They reviewed 168,915 studies to determine the rates of study approved by consensus, study changed by consensus, study not performed by consensus, study approved (no consensus), and study administratively not performed (no callback).
The effect of provider-radiologist collaboration was determined by the aggregated rates of study changed or not performed by consensus. The rate of no callback was used to assess sentinel effect. The combined rate of withdrawals and no callback represented the overall impact of radiologist participation.
The results showed that more than half of the studies (58.6%) were approved. Other findings showed:
• 6.8% of were changed
• 13.5% were withdrawn by consensus
• 6.0% were approved without consensus
• 15.2% were withdrawn because of no callback
• 35.5% of studies initially ordered were not performed at the time they were ordered
Highest aggregated rates of study changed or withdrawn by consensus:
• Family practice: 25.3%
• Internal Medicine: 23.8%
Lowest aggregated rates of study changed or withdrawn by consensus:
• Thoracic surgery: 13.3%
• Neurosurgery: 11.2%
• Orthopedic surgery: 9.3%
Highest rates of study withdrawn owing to no callback:
• Internal medicine: 18.0%
• Neurology: 17.7%
• Family practice: 17.4%
Lowest rates of study withdrawn owing to no callback:
• Pediatrics: 7.1%
• Ophthalmology: 7.3%
“The overall impact was greatest for family practice (42.7%), internal medicine (41.8%), and neurology (33.4%) and least for orthopedic surgery (22.8%) and neurosurgery (24.0%),” the authors wrote.
The study showed that participation by radiologists had substantial impact on patient care, regardless of provider specialty. The impact was greatest on primary care providers who are heavier users of radiology.
The Reading Room: Artificial Intelligence: What RSNA 2020 Offered, and What 2021 Could Bring
December 5th 2020Nina Kottler, M.D., chief medical officer of AI at Radiology Partners, discusses, during RSNA 2020, what new developments the annual meeting provided about these technologies, sessions to access, and what to expect in the coming year.
Current Perspectives on Radiology Workforce Issues and Potential Solutions
March 14th 2024Emphasizing the gravity of the ongoing workforce shortage in radiology, these authors recommend a change agenda focusing on expanded numbers of residency positions, reassessment of educational pathways, maintaining a strong presence in hospital settings and practice level initiatives to reduce administrative burden and achieve appropriate reimbursement beyond RVU measurements.
Could Cloud-Based 'Progressive Loading' be a Boon for Radiology Workflows?
March 13th 2024The newly launched Progressive Loading feature, available through RamSoft’s OmegaAI software, reportedly offers radiologist rapid uploading of images that is faster than on-site networks and other cloud-based systems regardless of the network radiologists are using.