The number of unidentified, not corrected errors in radiology reports of spine MRIs is significantly higher than that of corrected errors, according to a study presented at the RSNA meeting on Monday.
The number of unidentified, not corrected errors in radiology reports of spine MRIs is significantly higher than that of corrected errors, according to a study presented at the RSNA meeting on Monday.
Researchers obtained more than 2 million radiology reports of spine MRIs from January 2006 through December 2007 from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. They found 14 reports with addended errors, or errors identified after the report was signed. They found 20 unaddended errors, or errors not identified.
Half the addended errors were related to the wrong region (cervical versus thoracic, for example), 43% had the wrong vertebra number (vertebra number eight instead of nine, for instance), or both. In 2006 it took between five and seven days to correct an error; in 2007 it took between 11 and 13 days.
Nearly half the errors occurring in all the reports (47%) were probably or definitely clinically important.
Implications of the study include a potential role for software applications like natural language processing to identify errors at the time of dictation or final signoff, said Dr. Minal Jagtiani, a research fellow at MGH.
"Guidelines could include annotating the level of specific lesions on the images and then tagging them with the reports so they can be flagged if the annotation doesn't match up with the report," she said.
Lastly, radiologists should check for errors and encourage colleagues to correlate the level of radiological lesions with clinical complaints and images, she said.
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Large Medicare Study Shows Black Men Less Likely to Receive PET and MRI for Prostate Cancer Imaging
August 4th 2025An analysis of over 749,000 Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with prostate cancer over a five-year period found that Black men were 13 percent less likely to receive PET imaging and 16 percent less likely to receive MRI in comparison to White men.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current and Emerging Insights on Abbreviated Breast MRI, Part 3
August 4th 2025In the last of a three-part podcast episode, Stamatia Destounis, MD, Emily Conant, MD and Habib Rahbar, MD, share additional insights on practical considerations and potential challenges in integrating abbreviated breast MRI into clinical practice, and offer their thoughts on future research directions.
The Reading Room Podcast: A Closer Look at Remote MRI Safety, Part 3
August 4th 2025In the third of a three-part podcast episode, Emanuel Kanal, M.D. and Tobias Gilk, MRSO, MRSE, discuss strategies for maintaining the integrity of time-out procedures and communication with remote MRI scanning.
Study Reveals Significant Prevalence of Abnormal PET/MRI and Dual-Energy CT Findings with Long Covid
August 4th 2025In a prospective study involving nearly 100 patients with Long Covid, 57 percent of patients had PET/MRI abnormalities and 90 percent of the cohort had abnormalities on dual-energy CT scans.