The number of unidentified, not corrected errors in radiology reports of spine MRIs is significantly higher than that of corrected errors, according to a study presented at the RSNA meeting on Monday.
The number of unidentified, not corrected errors in radiology reports of spine MRIs is significantly higher than that of corrected errors, according to a study presented at the RSNA meeting on Monday.
Researchers obtained more than 2 million radiology reports of spine MRIs from January 2006 through December 2007 from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. They found 14 reports with addended errors, or errors identified after the report was signed. They found 20 unaddended errors, or errors not identified.
Half the addended errors were related to the wrong region (cervical versus thoracic, for example), 43% had the wrong vertebra number (vertebra number eight instead of nine, for instance), or both. In 2006 it took between five and seven days to correct an error; in 2007 it took between 11 and 13 days.
Nearly half the errors occurring in all the reports (47%) were probably or definitely clinically important.
Implications of the study include a potential role for software applications like natural language processing to identify errors at the time of dictation or final signoff, said Dr. Minal Jagtiani, a research fellow at MGH.
"Guidelines could include annotating the level of specific lesions on the images and then tagging them with the reports so they can be flagged if the annotation doesn't match up with the report," she said.
Lastly, radiologists should check for errors and encourage colleagues to correlate the level of radiological lesions with clinical complaints and images, she said.
Can Abbreviated Breast MRI Have an Impact in Assessing Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response?
April 24th 2025New research presented at the Society for Breast Imaging (SBI) conference suggests that abbreviated MRI is comparable to full MRI in assessing pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
New bpMRI Study Suggests AI Offers Comparable Results to Radiologists for PCa Detection
April 15th 2025Demonstrating no significant difference with radiologist detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), a biparametric MRI-based AI model provided an 88.4 percent sensitivity rate in a recent study.
Could Ultrafast MRI Enhance Detection of Malignant Foci for Breast Cancer?
April 10th 2025In a new study involving over 120 women, nearly two-thirds of whom had a family history of breast cancer, ultrafast MRI findings revealed a 5 percent increase in malignancy risk for each second increase in the difference between lesion and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) time to enhancement (TTE).