Screening MRI should be an adjunct to screening mammography in women with a personal history of breast cancer, researchers at the 2010 RSNA scientific assembly in Chicago said.
Screening MRI should be an adjunct to screening mammography in women with a personal history of breast cancer, researchers at the 2010 RSNA scientific assembly in Chicago said.
Currently, the American Cancer Society recommends screening MRI for women who have a genetic or family history of breast cancer. They are at a greater than 20% lifetime risk of contracting breast cancer. However, there has been insufficient evidence to date regarding women with a personal history of treated breast cancer.
In 1025 women undergoing their first screening MR in the five-year study period, researchers found 327 had a genetic family history and 646 had a personal history of breast cancer. The researchers found cancer yield was higher with screening MRI in women with a personal history (3.1%) compared with women with a genetic or family history (1.5%), despite fewer recommendations for biopsy. The findings suggest breast MRI should be added to screening mammography for these women.
In addition, 9.3% of patients with a personal history of breast cancer were recommended for biopsy as opposed to 15% of women with a genetic or family history.
Specificity of screening MRI was also higher in women with a personal history of breast cancer (93.6%) compared with women with a genetic or family history of the disease (86.3%).
Overall sensitivity for the entire study was 92.6%, with two occult cancers detected on MRI.
MRI may be an important adjunct to screening mammography in women with a personal history of breast cancer, said Dr. Wendy Demartini, an assistant professor of breast imaging at the University of Washington in Seattle and presenter of the study.
“Certainly further studies are necessary to clarify its role and, in particular, to identify subgroups most likely to benefit from this tool,” she said. “We hope studies like this will allow us to move into a personalized evidence-based surveillance of women who are breast cancer survivors.”
Five Insights on Artifacts and Limitations with Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
February 29th 2024Noting that technique issues, patient positioning miscues and atypical features can all contribute to faulty interpretation with contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), researchers at the European Congress of Radiology shared their insights on navigating artifacts and limitations with CEM.
Moving Beyond Mammography for Screening and Staging of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma
February 16th 2024For women with dense breasts, only 25 percent of breast radiologists are confident in the use of mammography for diagnosing invasive lobular carcinoma, according to newly published survey results from the Society of Breast Imaging.