Tablet PC and digital pen trump PDA for data entry

Article

Researchers may be ready to set aside traditional pen and paper for entering data in large clinical trials. Not only do investigators prefer their digital counterparts, but those devices also lead to a reduction in data entry errors.

Researchers may be ready to set aside traditional pen and paper for entering data in large clinical trials. Not only do investigators prefer their digital counterparts, but those devices also lead to a reduction in data entry errors.

At the 2004 RSNA meeting, researchers from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill compared a Tablet PC, digital pen, PDA/digitizer hybrid, and traditional PDA in terms of speed, ease of use, accuracy, and user satisfaction.

Pen and paper entry was used as a control. The standard paper control was the fastest method of data entry, at an average time of 155.2 seconds per case. The stand-alone PDA had the slowest result, at an average of 276.6 seconds for complete entry.

The researchers found no statistically significant difference between data entry times for the digital pen, pen and paper, and the Tablet PC.

Newsletter

Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.

Recent Videos
Diagnostic Imaging’s Top Five Breast Imaging Content: Summer 2025
Reducing Mammography Workload by Nearly 40 Percent? What a New Hybrid AI Study Reveals
 What New Research Reveals About Portable Low-Field MRI and Patients with Suspected Alzheimer’s Disease
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.