Traditional polygraph tests to determine whether someone is lying may take a back seat to fMRI, according to a study in the February issue of Radiology. Researchers from Temple University Hospital used fMRI to show how specific areas of the brain light up when a person tells a lie.
Traditional polygraph tests to determine whether someone is lying may take a back seat to fMRI, according to a study in the February issue of Radiology. Researchers from Temple University Hospital used fMRI to show how specific areas of the brain light up when a person tells a lie.
"We have detected areas of the brain activated by deception and truth telling by using a method that is verifiable against the current gold standard method of lie detection - the conventional polygraph," said lead author Feroze B. Mohamed, Ph.D., an associate professor of radiology at Temple.
Standard polygraph tests have failed to produce consistently reliable results, largely because they rely on outward manifestations of certain emotions that people feel when lying. These include increased perspiration, changing body positions, and subtle facial expressions. While natural, they can be suppressed by a large enough number of people that the accuracy and consistency of the polygraph results are compromised.
"Since brain activation is arguably less susceptible to being controlled by an individual, our research will hopefully eliminate the shortcomings of the conventional polygraph test and produce a new method of objective lie detection that can be used reliably in a courtroom or other setting," Mohamed said.
Researchers recruited 11 subjects for the study. They staged a mock shooting, in which blank bullets were fired in a testing room. Five volunteers were asked to tell the truth when asked a series of questions about their involvement, and six were asked to deliberately lie.
Each volunteer was examined with fMRI to observe brain activation while they answered questions either truthfully or deceptively. They also underwent a conventional polygraph test. The same questions were asked in both exams, and results were compared among the groups.
"With fMRI, there were, consistently, unique areas of the brain - and more of them - that were activated during the deceptive process than during truth telling," Mohamed said.
In producing a deceptive response, a person must inhibit or conceal the truth, which activates parts of the brain that are not required for truth telling. Thus, telling the truth activates fewer areas of the brain.
Fourteen areas of the brain were active during the deceptive process. In contrast, only seven areas lit up when subjects answered truthfully. By studying the images, investigators were able to develop a better picture of the deception process in the brain. The increased activity in the frontal lobe, especially, indicated how the brain works to inhibit the truth and construct a lie.
Polygraph test results correlated well with actual events when subjects were asked to lie (92% accuracy). The results were less conclusive, however, when subjects were asked to tell the truth (70% accuracy).
The largest implications for a credible method of lie detection are in the field of crime investigation and prevention and in the judicial determination of the guilt or innocence of accused individuals. Since the polygraph has not been embraced as fully credible, the authors hope to provide a more accurate means of determining whether someone is telling the truth.
"A more consistent and verifiable method of lie detection could lead to changes in this particular realm of the legal system down the road," Mohamed said.
For more information from the Diagnostic Imaging archives:
Functional MRI sniffs out liars and cheats
Strategic goals take shape in functional brain MR imaging
Functional imaging leads hunt for 'buy' trigger
Stay at the forefront of radiology with the Diagnostic Imaging newsletter, delivering the latest news, clinical insights, and imaging advancements for today’s radiologists.
Large Medicare Study Shows Black Men Less Likely to Receive PET and MRI for Prostate Cancer Imaging
August 2nd 2025An analysis of over 749,000 Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with prostate cancer over a five-year period found that Black men were 13 percent less likely to receive PET imaging and 16 percent less likely to receive MRI in comparison to White men.
The Reading Room Podcast: Current and Emerging Insights on Abbreviated Breast MRI, Part 3
August 2nd 2025In the last of a three-part podcast episode, Stamatia Destounis, MD, Emily Conant, MD and Habib Rahbar, MD, share additional insights on practical considerations and potential challenges in integrating abbreviated breast MRI into clinical practice, and offer their thoughts on future research directions.
The Reading Room Podcast: A Closer Look at Remote MRI Safety, Part 3
August 2nd 2025In the third of a three-part podcast episode, Emanuel Kanal, M.D. and Tobias Gilk, MRSO, MRSE, discuss strategies for maintaining the integrity of time-out procedures and communication with remote MRI scanning.
Study Reveals Significant Prevalence of Abnormal PET/MRI and Dual-Energy CT Findings with Long Covid
August 2nd 2025In a prospective study involving nearly 100 patients with Long Covid, 57 percent of patients had PET/MRI abnormalities and 90 percent of the cohort had abnormalities on dual-energy CT scans.